Skip to main content

Security report for newtarget.com

New Target, inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

New Target, Inc. is a professional digital agency specializing in creative, marketing campaigns, and website design, primarily serving brands and nonprofits in Southern California and Washington D.C. The company offers a comprehensive suite of services including marketing, website development, branding, and creative production. Their market position is strong within the nonprofit and brand sectors, supported by award-winning campaigns and a well-structured digital presence. The website reflects a mature digital infrastructure leveraging WordPress and Elementor, with extensive use of modern analytics and marketing technologies. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and security headers implemented, though there is room for improvement in publicly disclosing privacy and security policies. Overall, the business demonstrates credibility and professionalism, but the absence of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy that should be addressed.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching newtarget.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention newtarget.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
6
Employees
0
Customers
3
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
17%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for newtarget.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

New Target operates as a medium-sized digital agency with a clear focus on technology and nonprofit sectors. Their business model revolves around providing digital marketing, branding, and web development services to established brands and nonprofits. The company leverages a variety of marketing tools and analytics platforms to deliver data-driven campaigns. The presence of multiple social media channels and a portfolio of work indicates active market engagement and growth potential. However, the lack of visible privacy and cookie policies may impact compliance and user trust. The company does not appear to have subsidiaries or parent companies, positioning itself as an independent agency.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and includes essential security headers, indicating a good baseline security posture. Anti-spam and bot detection mechanisms are in place, enhancing protection against automated threats. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests gaps in transparency and preparedness. The extensive use of third-party tracking and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and necessitates regular security audits. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is not clearly demonstrated, which could pose regulatory risks.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and disclose a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide contact information for a Data Protection Officer or security contact to enhance transparency.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential security vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
New Target, inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
New Target, inc.
Description
Premier Digital Agency in Southern California & Washington D.C. providing creative, digital marketing and website design for brands you know & nonprofits you love.
Key services
Marketing, Websites, Branding, Creative
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Matomo, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Crazy Egg, CleanTalk Anti-Spam
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anti-spam protection via CleanTalk
  • Bot detection enabled
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Crazy Egg
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Matomo, Crazy Egg
Marketing tools
Marketing automation, Social listening, AI chatbot solutions
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible unregistered domain or privacy protection
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage
  4. Multiple marketing and analytics scripts are used, indicating extensive user tracking
  5. Contact information is present and consistent with business identity
  6. No security or incident response policies publicly disclosed
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected
  8. Website uses modern technologies and CMS (WordPress with Elementor)
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
  10. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor framework, supported by a modern tech stack including jQuery and various marketing and analytics integrations such as Google Tag Manager, Matomo, Facebook Pixel, and Crazy Egg. Performance optimizations like WP Rocket caching and lazy loading are implemented, resulting in fast load times and excellent mobile responsiveness. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine visibility. Accessibility features are present but could be further improved. The technical infrastructure is robust, but reliance on multiple third-party scripts requires vigilant security management to avoid risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with newtarget.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review newtarget.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.