Skip to main content

Security report for newsmemory.com

Tecnavia · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tecnavia operates a professional website offering a comprehensive suite of e-publishing solutions targeted at newspapers, magazines, corporate publishers, and press associations. The company positions itself as a mature player in the digital publishing technology sector, emphasizing product breadth, customer testimonials, and a 50-year anniversary brand presence. The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, Video.js, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and rich content. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent, though some security headers and incident response information are missing. WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, but the website content and branding suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching newsmemory.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tecnavia targets the media and technology sectors, providing digital publishing solutions such as digital replicas, paywalls, e-tearsheets, and advanced marketplace features. Their business model is B2B SaaS, serving publishers globally with a medium-sized operation. The company leverages partnerships with notable media groups and showcases a broad client base. The website reflects a stable market position with a focus on innovation and customer service. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, subscription services, and technical support. The company emphasizes integration capabilities with editorial systems and offers 24/7 technical support, indicating a customer-centric approach. The presence of multiple international phone numbers suggests a global footprint.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, indicating attention to privacy and security compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response page limits transparency and preparedness visibility. No security.txt file was found, which is a recommended best practice for vulnerability disclosure. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in headers and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Continue maintaining GDPR compliance and enhance privacy notices with clear data retention policies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tecnavia
Description
More than an e-Edition: a full range of e-Publishing Solutions for newspapers and magazines. Cohesive layout and user experience across platforms.
Key services
Daily Edition, Magazine Edition, Corporate Edition, Press Associations, Metered Paywall, e-Tearsheets, Digital Replica, 2-in-One App, Website headless CMS, e-Archive
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.1.1, Yoast SEO plugin, Video.js, jQuery 1.12.4, Google Analytics (ga.js), Cookiebot consent management, Google Fonts (Open Sans), Various Avia theme scripts and styles
Frameworks
WordPress, Avia Framework
Platforms
Web, Mobile (iOS and Android apps referenced)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot session tracker
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based professional site for Tecnavia's e-publishing solutions
  2. Content is rich with product descriptions, customer testimonials, and client logos
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  4. No visible security.txt or incident response information
  5. No email addresses explicitly found in the HTML content
  6. Multiple phone numbers listed in footer with clear country context
  7. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content
  8. No terms of service page clearly identified
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.1.1 with the Enfold theme and Avia framework, using modern JavaScript libraries such as Video.js and jQuery. SEO is enhanced with Yoast plugin, and fonts are loaded from Google Fonts. Cookiebot manages cookie consent, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from the same domain and trusted CDNs, suggesting a well-structured asset pipeline. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and asset optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and accessibility features are basic but present. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but updating WordPress and plugins to latest versions is recommended for security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100 −6Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 68/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with newsmemory.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review newsmemory.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.