Skip to main content

Security report for newmindmedia.com

Simpleview · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Simpleview Europe is a specialized digital agency providing comprehensive tourism technology solutions including CMS, CRM, DMS, and digital marketing services. As part of Granicus, it holds a strong market position serving Destination Management Organisations and tourism boards across Europe. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies and extensive service offerings. However, the absence of WHOIS data and lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies indicate areas for improvement in transparency and compliance. The technical infrastructure is robust with use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools, supporting good performance and user experience. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking visible security headers and published policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer contact and security information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching newmindmedia.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Simpleview operates in the tourism technology sector, targeting B2B clients such as national and regional tourist boards and destination marketing organizations. Its competitive advantage lies in industry-specific solutions and a long-standing presence since the late 1990s. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, digital marketing services, and support contracts. The company benefits from its parent company Granicus, enhancing its market reach and credibility. The website showcases a broad product portfolio and client success stories, indicating a mature partnership ecosystem and growth orientation. Strategic observations include the need to improve transparency around data protection and incident response to align with evolving regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS usage and no exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of visible security headers, absence of published security policies, and no incident response contact information highlight compliance gaps. The extensive use of third-party tracking and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosures or security certifications. The site would benefit from implementing security best practices such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and publishing a security policy to enhance trust and regulatory compliance. Incident response readiness appears limited due to missing contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and designate an incident response team.
  4. Audit and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve user trust.
  5. Verify and publish WHOIS domain registration details to enhance business credibility and transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Simpleview
Description
Simpleview is a global digital agency specialising in the tourism sector. Since the late 1990's they have been developing solutions for Destination Management Organisations, National and Regional Tourist Boards, City Councils and Tourism Associations across Europe. They provide award-winning tourism websites and a fully featured Destination Management System supporting marketing and business activities of tourism destinations.
Key services
Content Management System (CMS), Destination Management System (DMS), Customer Relationship Management (CRM), Online Booking, Revenue Generation, Email Marketing, User-Generated Content, Eventsforce, Digital Accessibility, Data & Insights
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
RequireJS, jQuery 2.2.4, Vue.js, Glide.js, Plyr video player, Vimeo Player API, FontAwesome 6 Pro, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Act-On Tracker, Cloudinary
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by canonical link with https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Act-On Tracker
Marketing tools
Act-On
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages explicitly found in provided content.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content.
  4. Strong use of modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools.
  5. No security policy or incident response information published.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating privacy or unregistered domain.
  7. Good branding and professional presentation consistent with a B2B technology provider.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including RequireJS, Vue.js, jQuery, and various analytics and marketing tools. It employs a proprietary CMS tailored for tourism destinations. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and SEO meta tags. However, there is room for improvement in security configurations and privacy compliance. The use of multiple tracking services indicates a focus on marketing analytics but requires careful management to avoid privacy issues. Technical debt appears low, but ongoing modernization and security hardening are recommended to maintain operational resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with newmindmedia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review newmindmedia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.