Skip to main content

Security report for nevercode.io

Nevercode Ltd. · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in Security headers.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nevercode Ltd. operates Codemagic, a specialized SaaS platform providing continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) services tailored for mobile app development across multiple frameworks including Flutter, React Native, native Android/iOS, Unity, Ionic, and MAUI. The platform targets mobile development teams seeking to automate build, test, and release workflows to accelerate app delivery. With over 150,000 developers trusting the service, Codemagic holds a strong market position as a focused mobile CI/CD solution with enterprise-grade features and integrations. Technically, the website demonstrates a modern and performant infrastructure hosted on AWS, utilizing JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5 with integrations for Google Tag Manager and Plausible Analytics. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital presence. The platform itself offers cloud-based, fully maintained infrastructure with support for multiple hardware/software configurations, emphasizing ease of use and automation. From a security perspective, Codemagic maintains a robust posture with HTTPS enforced, SOC 2 type 2 and ISO 27001 certifications, and compliance with GDPR and CCPA. The website includes privacy and security statements and cookie consent mechanisms. However, there is no public incident response contact or security.txt file, which could enhance transparency and vulnerability management. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, Codemagic presents a trustworthy, professional, and technically sound offering with strong compliance and security practices. The domain registration is privacy protected but consistent with the company profile and age. Strategic recommendations include publishing a security.txt file, adding explicit incident response contacts, and enhancing security headers to further strengthen security posture and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nevercode.io

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nevercode.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
75
Employees
0
Customers
75
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
15%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nevercode.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Codemagic is positioned as a niche SaaS provider in the mobile CI/CD market, leveraging integrations with popular version control systems and supporting a wide range of mobile frameworks. Its business model includes usage-based and unlimited plans with enterprise options, targeting development teams and organizations focused on mobile app delivery efficiency. The company benefits from a strong ecosystem of partner domains specialized in Flutter, React Native, and Unity CI/CD services, indicating a strategic partnership network. The absence of direct public contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via forms and enterprise sales contacts. The company’s certifications and compliance attest to a mature operational and security framework, supporting growth and customer trust.

Security posture

Codemagic exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, SOC 2 type 2 and ISO 27001 certifications, and adherence to GDPR and CCPA regulations. The platform automates sensitive processes such as code signing and integrates securely with Apple Developer portals. The website’s security headers are not explicitly detailed, suggesting room for improvement. No public vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts were found, which could limit transparency in security incident handling. Overall, the risk of security incidents appears low, but enhancing public security communication and headers would improve resilience and customer confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  2. Add explicit incident response contact information on the website or security statement page.
  3. Implement and enforce additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance public contact options with verified company emails or phone numbers for security and support inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nevercode Ltd.
Description
Codemagic provides continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) services for mobile app development, supporting Android, iOS, Flutter, React Native, Unity, Ionic, and MAUI projects. It automates building, testing, and releasing mobile apps to accelerate development workflows.
Key services
Continuous Integration, Continuous Delivery, Code signing management, Build automation, Testing automation, App distribution
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics
Platforms
Web, Cloud-based CI/CD
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Code signing management
  • Privacy and security policies published
  • SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong focus on mobile CI/CD services with broad platform support
  3. Good privacy and security compliance with certifications
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed, contact via forms
  5. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with cookie consent
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  7. WHOIS privacy protection used but justified for business type
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, and uses Google Tag Manager and Plausible Analytics for tracking and marketing. Hosting is on AWS, inferred from DNS records. The site is mobile-optimized, fast-loading, and accessible with clear navigation and professional design. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. The technical implementation supports a scalable SaaS platform with cloud-based infrastructure for CI/CD services. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and publish vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nevercode.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nevercode.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.