Skip to main content

Security report for neural.one

AdgravityGroup S.L · Technology · Spain

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Neural.ONE is a small technology company based in Spain, operated by AdgravityGroup S.L, specializing in AI-powered marketing attribution solutions. Their website presents a professional and consistent brand image focused on delivering real-time marketing insights to optimize campaign ROI. The company targets marketing professionals and businesses seeking advanced attribution analytics. Technically, the website is built on the Squarespace platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection and Google Fonts for typography. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO and accessibility basics. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, though DNSSEC is not configured. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie policy and consent mechanism present but lacking a published privacy policy or terms of service. No direct contact information or incident response details are publicly available, which limits transparency. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching neural.one

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the niche market of AI-driven marketing attribution, providing tools to measure and maximize marketing campaign effectiveness. Their business model appears to be B2B SaaS, targeting marketing teams and agencies. The website content emphasizes efficiency and data-driven decision making. The company has maintained its domain since 2015, consistent with its founding year, suggesting stable operations. The lack of extensive social media presence or partner domains indicates a focused but possibly early-stage market presence. No certifications or trust badges are displayed, which could be an area for future enhancement to build credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and HSTS headers, reducing risks of man-in-the-middle attacks. Integration of Google reCAPTCHA helps mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of DNSSEC leaves DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing. No public security policies, vulnerability disclosure programs, or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent implemented but no privacy policy published, which may pose regulatory risks under GDPR.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add explicit security and incident response policies, including contact channels for reporting vulnerabilities.
  4. Provide clear company contact information such as email and phone to improve transparency and customer support.
  5. Consider obtaining relevant certifications or trust badges to strengthen market credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AdgravityGroup S.L
Description
AI-powered marketing attribution. Discover the true impact of your campaigns. Maximize your ROI with accurate, real-time insights.
Key services
AI attribution, Marketing campaign impact analysis, Real-time marketing insights
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Fonts (Roboto), JavaScript, CSS
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA integrated

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
AI-powered marketing attribution, Squarespace marketing automations
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Squarespace platform with professional design
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main site
  3. Cookie policy is present with opt-in/out consent mechanism
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site
  5. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  7. Social media presence limited to Instagram link to Squarespace official account
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. No incident response or security policy information publicly available
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Squarespace, a reputable platform providing managed hosting and CMS capabilities. The tech stack includes standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, and Google reCAPTCHA. The site uses modern meta tags for SEO and social media integration (Open Graph, Twitter Cards). Performance is moderate, with optimized images and lazy loading. Mobile responsiveness is good, ensuring accessibility across devices. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies, reflecting a straightforward implementation suitable for the business scope. There is room for technical enhancements in security (DNSSEC) and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with neural.one. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review neural.one.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.