Skip to main content

Security report for networm.cz

Networm Studio · Technology · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

62/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Networm Studio is a small Czech-based group of freelancers specializing in custom web development, SEO optimization, e-commerce solutions, and social media marketing. Operating since 2005, they focus on personalized client solutions rather than templated websites, targeting businesses seeking tailored online presence. The website is built on WordPress with common technologies like Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google reCAPTCHA, indicating a moderate level of technical maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and anti-bot measures but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits domain trust verification, but the website content and contact information appear professional and consistent with a legitimate business. Overall, the site is safe, well-structured, and serves its business purpose effectively.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching networm.cz

This scan found 10 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
Average
62

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Networm Studio occupies a niche market in the Czech Republic offering bespoke web design and digital marketing services. Their competitive advantage lies in personalized service and ongoing website maintenance including SEO and social media management. The business model is service-oriented with revenue likely from project-based web development and marketing contracts. The target customers are local businesses and individuals requiring professional online presence. The company demonstrates a stable presence since 2005 but lacks publicly visible certifications or formal privacy compliance documentation. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but client references indicate a diverse portfolio. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and formalizing compliance and security practices.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA on its contact form, which are positive security measures. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found. The absence of a security.txt file or incident response contact reduces preparedness for vulnerability disclosures. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential HTTP security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear terms of service to improve user trust and legal compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Networm Studio
Description
Networm Studio is a group of freelancers since 2005 specializing in creating customized websites tailored to client needs, including SEO optimization, internet marketing, and ongoing maintenance.
Key services
Webové stránky, Internetový obchod, Seo Optimalizace, Sociální sítě
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3, Font Awesome, Google reCAPTCHA, Slider Revolution
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Facebook marketing (implied)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Czech language targeting local Czech market.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries.
  6. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA but lacks advanced security headers.
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Website is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap 3, jQuery, Font Awesome, and Slider Revolution plugin. It uses Google Analytics for tracking and Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection on forms. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and has moderate performance. The technical stack is somewhat dated (Bootstrap 3) but functional. There is no indication of advanced hosting provider or CDN usage from the data. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and some SEO best practices could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but modernization and security enhancements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with networm.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review networm.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.