Skip to main content

Security report for netvision.lv

SIA NETVISION · Telecommunications · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA NETVISION is a well-established Latvian telecommunications provider offering optical home internet, interactive TV, fixed telephony, and data center services. With over 16 years of market presence, the company targets residential and business customers in Latvia, providing competitive packages and reliable connectivity solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service descriptions and customer support channels. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics and Tag Manager, with responsive design and good SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent. Overall, the site is trustworthy, compliant with GDPR, and free from suspicious content or domains.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching netvision.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NETVISION operates in the telecommunications sector, focusing on internet, TV, and telephony services primarily for Latvian customers. The business model revolves around subscription-based service packages with options for equipment sales. The company demonstrates a stable market position with a medium-sized footprint and a history dating back to 2004. Their digital presence includes social media engagement and customer-oriented features such as FAQs and online forms. While no explicit partnerships or subsidiaries are identified, the company maintains a transparent and consistent brand. Revenue streams likely derive from service subscriptions and equipment sales. Growth indicators include ongoing service promotions and a comprehensive service portfolio.

Security posture

The website shows a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS usage and cookie consent compliance. However, there is a lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts is evident, but managed with user consent. To enhance security posture, the company should implement standard HTTP security headers, publish a security policy, and provide clear incident response channels. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalization and transparency improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response and abuse contact information.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and update privacy and data retention disclosures for transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA NETVISION
Registration number
40103243156
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA NETVISION
Description
Strauji augošs Telekomunikāciju pakalpojumu sniedzējs, kas jau vairāk kā 16 gadus sniedz savus pakalpojumus (Internets, TV, Fiksētā telefonija u.c.) Latvijas iedzīvotājiem.
Key services
Optical home internet, Interactive TV, Fixed telephony, Data center services, Equipment sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts (Montserrat), JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed cookie declaration
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrica, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (implied by _fbp cookie)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  2. Multiple contact channels including phone, email, physical address, and contact forms.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  5. No terms of service explicitly found.
  6. Good content quality and professional presentation.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram.
  9. No suspicious or malicious external domains detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google Fonts, ensuring good SEO and user tracking capabilities. The site is mobile responsive with a clear navigation structure and professional design. No CMS or hosting provider was explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated libraries in the provided HTML. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and formalize technical documentation to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with netvision.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review netvision.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.