Skip to main content

Security report for netsite.dk

Netsite A/S · Technology · Denmark

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Netsite A/S is a Danish hosting provider established in 1998, specializing in domain registration, web hosting, DNS services, and email hosting with a strong focus on the Danish market. The company emphasizes stability, security, and customer satisfaction, offering products such as domain monitoring, WordPress hosting, and portfolio management. Their website reflects a professional and trustworthy business with clear contact channels and comprehensive service descriptions. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap and Font Awesome, with responsive design and accessibility features ensuring a positive user experience across devices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, secure forms, and privacy-respecting cookie practices, although explicit security policies and incident response information are not published. The absence of WHOIS data limits transparency but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security and incident response policies and enhancing WHOIS transparency to improve trust further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching netsite.dk

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Netsite operates in the technology sector, targeting individuals and businesses in Denmark seeking domain and hosting services. Their business model centers on direct sales of domains, web hosting, and DNS services with a focus on quality and customer support. The company leverages its long-standing market presence since 1998 to build trust and maintain high customer satisfaction. Their ecosystem includes integrations with webmail and control panel platforms, and they maintain active social media presence on Twitter and Facebook. Pricing is transparent and straightforward, appealing to cost-conscious customers. The company’s strategic positioning as a local Danish provider with data centers in Denmark and 100% green energy usage differentiates it in the market. Growth potential lies in expanding service offerings and enhancing digital marketing efforts.

Security posture

Netsite demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide, secure form implementations, and a privacy-conscious approach to cookies and tracking. The presence of a cookie consent modal for chat services indicates compliance with GDPR requirements. However, the website lacks a dedicated security policy or incident response page, which are important for transparency and customer assurance. No security headers were detected in the provided data, suggesting room for improvement in HTTP security configurations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security documentation and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and customer trust.
  2. Implement and configure HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents, including abuse and security email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and chat widgets to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Netsite A/S
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Netsite A/S
Description
Professionel hosting siden 1998 med fokus på registrering af domæner og webhoteller med PHP samt WordPress.
Key services
Domain registration, Web hosting (webhoteller), DNS hosting service, Email hosting, WordPress hosting, Domain monitoring and portfolio management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Font Awesome 6 (Free, Pro, Duotone, Sharp, Brands), JavaScript, SVG graphics, JSON-LD structured data
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical and og:url using https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper labels and ARIA attributes
  • No visible vulnerable libraries
  • Cookie consent modal for chat widget
  • No tracking or marketing cookies detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
excellent

Advertising

Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is comprehensive, well-structured, and professionally presented.
  3. Strong focus on Danish market with localized language and services.
  4. Clear contact information and multiple customer support channels.
  5. No signs of tracking or marketing cookies; privacy respected.
  6. Modern design with responsive layout and accessibility considerations.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response page.
  8. WHOIS data is missing, limiting domain registration transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and Bootstrap framework, ensuring responsive and accessible design. Font Awesome icons are extensively used for UI consistency. The site loads quickly and is optimized for mobile devices. Structured data in JSON-LD format enhances SEO and provides clear business information to search engines. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified, but the site emphasizes Danish data centers and green energy usage. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site approach. The technical implementation is robust with no visible errors or broken elements, supporting a high-quality user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with netsite.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review netsite.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.