Skip to main content

Security report for netnut.io

NetNut · Technology · Israel

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NetNut is a technology company specializing in providing high-quality proxy services and web data collection solutions. Established in 2017 and headquartered in Israel, NetNut offers a broad range of proxy types including residential, rotating residential, static residential, mobile, and datacenter proxies. Their services also extend to website unblockers and various scraper APIs, targeting businesses and developers requiring reliable and scalable data extraction capabilities. The company holds a strong market position with over 85 million residential IPs and a significant client base, supported by positive user ratings and professional branding. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern web technologies and analytics tools such as HubSpot and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, providing a good user experience. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security policies or vulnerability disclosures. Privacy compliance is limited by the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies. Overall, NetNut demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching netnut.io

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
60
Email security
82
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NetNut operates in the technology sector, focusing on proxy networks and data extraction services. Their business model is B2B SaaS, catering to enterprises needing geo-restricted IP access and large-scale data scraping. The company leverages a large proxy pool and offers APIs to facilitate data collection at scale. Their market positioning is strong, supported by extensive IP resources and a comprehensive service portfolio. The website indicates active marketing and customer engagement through HubSpot and social media channels. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is justified given the nature of their business. No direct parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company targets global clients, with localized domains for Russia and China, indicating international reach and growth strategy.

Security posture

NetNut's security posture is moderate to good. The website enforces HTTPS, uses Cloudflare DNS, and maintains domain status without issues. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of security headers or published security policies reduce the overall security maturity. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder trust from security-conscious clients. The site uses modern libraries and frameworks without visible vulnerabilities. Data collection is performed via secure forms integrated with HubSpot and WPForms, but explicit security measures for data protection are not documented. Compliance with GDPR is not clearly demonstrated, and cookie consent mechanisms are missing. Overall, while the technical security baseline is adequate, transparency and formal security governance need enhancement.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and trust.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  3. Add a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
NetNut
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NetNut
Description
High quality proxy service for web scraping and data security. Over 85 million residential proxies and 5M mobile proxies to pass geo-restrictions and IP blocks.
Key services
Residential Proxies, Rotating Residential Proxies, Static Residential Proxies, Mobile Proxies, Datacenter Proxies, Website Unblocker, SERP Scraper API, B2B Data Scraper API, Datasets (Professional Profile, Company)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Elementor, Bootstrap 5, Slick Carousel, HubSpot Analytics and Banner, Crisp Chat, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No DNSSEC (not enabled)
  • Domain status OK
  • Use of privacy protection for WHOIS

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Crisp Chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive about proxy and data scraping services.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page.
  4. Contact information is available including email and physical address.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. WHOIS privacy protection used but domain age and status are good.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; full content accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, using jQuery, Bootstrap 5, and Slick Carousel for UI components. Analytics and marketing tools include HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Crisp Chat for customer support. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and DNS services. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with some external dependencies. No critical technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and implement DNSSEC for enhanced domain security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with netnut.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review netnut.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.