Skip to main content

Security report for netnordic-community.no

NetNordic Norway AS · Technology · Norway

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NetNordic Community is a newly launched resource platform by NetNordic Norway AS, designed to support users of their technology solutions with a centralized, user-friendly interface. The platform targets existing customers and users, providing login access to personalized resources and support. The website is professionally designed with a clear structure and Norwegian language content, reflecting a medium-sized technology company operating primarily in Norway. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and jQuery libraries, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate but could be improved by implementing additional HTTP security headers and multi-factor authentication. Privacy compliance is supported by links to comprehensive privacy and cookie policies on the corporate site, though no explicit consent mechanism is present on this platform. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business launch timeline, indicating legitimacy and consistency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching netnordic-community.no

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
65
Average
53
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NetNordic Norway AS operates in the technology sector, providing IT solutions and services primarily in Norway. The community platform serves as a support and resource hub for their customers, enhancing user engagement and service delivery. The business model focuses on B2B service provision with an emphasis on customer support and collaboration. The company is part of the larger NetNordic Group AS, indicating a structured corporate ecosystem. The website's content and branding are consistent with corporate standards, reinforcing trust and professionalism. The absence of direct contact information on this platform suggests a controlled access environment, likely requiring authenticated user interaction for detailed support. The partnership with the parent company domain netnordic.com is evident and important for brand coherence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS implied and secure form submission via POST. However, no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided data, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The login form masks password input but lacks visible multi-factor authentication or advanced security features. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available on this platform, indicating potential gaps in transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in header implementation and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Verify and enforce HTTPS across all pages to ensure encrypted communications.
  3. Introduce multi-factor authentication for user login to strengthen access control.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to proactively identify and mitigate risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NetNordic Norway AS
Description
NetNordic Community is a resource platform designed to support users in their journey with NetNordic solutions, aiming to provide an efficient, user-friendly, and informative experience.
Key services
Resource platform, User support, Solution collaboration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Login form uses POST method
  • Password input field masked

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. Site is primarily in Norwegian language targeting Norwegian users.
  3. Login form collects email and password securely via POST.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the page.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are linked to the main corporate site.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  7. No social media links or phone numbers detected.
  8. Scripts used are mainly jQuery and related plugins for UI and scrolling effects.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  10. No advertising or marketing scripts present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with jQuery and related UI plugins. The site structure is clear and mobile responsive, providing a good user experience. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight platform. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or CDN usage. Accessibility features are basic, with potential for enhancement to meet higher standards. SEO optimization is minimal but present through meta tags and structured layout. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts indicates a privacy-conscious approach or limited marketing integration. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with netnordic-community.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review netnordic-community.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.