Skip to main content

Security report for netbeat.de

Netbeat GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Netbeat GmbH is a German-based web hosting provider offering affordable and professional web hosting, domain registration, and server solutions primarily targeting private users and small to medium-sized businesses. The company emphasizes transparency, compliance with GDPR, and security certifications such as ISO 27001, hosting all services in German data centers operated by their partner Vautron Rechenzentrum AG. The website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and provides clear information about various hosting packages with competitive pricing. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Bootstrap and jQuery, with privacy-conscious analytics via Matomo. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and ISO certification, though security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong with explicit cookie consent and a comprehensive privacy policy. Overall, the site projects a trustworthy and professional image suitable for its market segment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching netbeat.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Netbeat holds a competitive position in the German web hosting market by offering budget-friendly hosting packages with a focus on transparency and compliance. Their business model revolves around tiered hosting services, domain registration, and email hosting, catering to a broad audience from private users to professional webmasters. The company benefits from long-standing partnerships with reputable data center providers and technology partners, enhancing service reliability. Their 20+ years of experience and ISO 27001 certification serve as strong trust signals. The absence of direct contact emails in the HTML suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via support portals. The company’s marketing approach includes clear pricing, money-back guarantees, and 24/7 support, positioning them as a reliable and customer-focused provider.

Security posture

Netbeat demonstrates a mature security posture with hosting in ISO 27001 certified data centers and enforced HTTPS across the site. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism and a comprehensive privacy policy indicates GDPR awareness and compliance. However, the website lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, which could be improved to strengthen transparency and readiness. Overall, the security measures align well with industry standards for a hosting provider of this size and market segment.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and security culture.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding direct, clearly labeled contact emails and phone numbers on the website to improve customer trust and communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Netbeat GmbH
Description
Netbeat GmbH offers affordable web hosting and webspace services, including domain registration, email hosting, and server solutions. They target private users and small to medium enterprises with various hosting packages ranging from simple to professional levels.
Key services
Webhosting packages, Domain registration and redirect services, Email hosting and forwarding, Dedicated and cloud servers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, SweetAlert2, FontAwesome, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ISO 27001 certified data center
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is in German and professionally presented
  3. Strong emphasis on transparency and compliance (GDPR, ISO 27001)
  4. Multiple hosting packages clearly described with pricing
  5. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms are implemented
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible in HTML, but support contact pages exist
  7. Use of Matomo analytics indicates privacy-conscious tracking
  8. Hosting and data center partners are prominently disclosed
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and stable technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and SweetAlert2 for enhanced UI alerts. FontAwesome provides iconography, and Matomo is used for privacy-focused analytics. Hosting is provided by Vautron Rechenzentrum AG, a certified German data center operator. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. There is no evidence of a CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks are minimal but could be further reduced by implementing recommended security headers and improving accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with netbeat.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review netbeat.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.