Skip to main content

Security report for neocarrier.com

Neocarrier Communications · Telecommunications · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Neocarrier Communications is a specialized telecommunications service provider offering managed network services such as SD-WAN, IP Transit, MPLS VPN, and Internet Access. Established around 2015, the company positions itself as a dynamic and innovative player with a global IP network (AS48885), targeting businesses seeking reliable and agile network connectivity solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and a focus on customer engagement through contact forms and social media channels. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and SEO tools, delivering moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms, though there is room for improvement in security headers and formal security policy disclosures. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and cookie consent banner present, but GDPR compliance is not explicitly stated. Overall, the domain registration is privacy-protected but consistent with the company's history, supporting legitimacy. The website is safe for general audiences and demonstrates a high level of business credibility and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching neocarrier.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Neocarrier operates in the telecommunications sector, focusing on managed network services for enterprises. Their business model revolves around providing connectivity solutions and advisory services, leveraging a global IP network infrastructure. The company emphasizes simplicity, agility, speed, and technology-driven solutions as competitive advantages. Their target customers are businesses requiring advanced network services, including cloud connectivity and digital transformation support. The presence of social media links and a professional website indicates active engagement and marketing efforts. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent operation. The company maintains a consistent brand and content quality, which supports trust and market positioning.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and Google reCAPTCHA is used to protect contact forms from spam and abuse. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response information, which could hinder transparency and readiness in case of security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy present but lacking explicit GDPR compliance statements. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with additional policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by explicitly addressing GDPR requirements and data retention policies.
  5. Improve website accessibility to meet recognized standards and broaden user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Neocarrier Communications
Description
Neocarrier Communications is a provider of Managed network services including SD-WAN, IP Transit, MPLS VPN and Internet Access
Key services
SD-WAN, IP Transit, MPLS VPN, Internet Access, Ethernet & MPLS, Internet VPN
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, Contact Form 7, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, Perfect Scrollbar
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Social Pug (Social sharing plugin)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Clear focus on managed network services and telecommunications
  3. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools
  4. Contact form protected by Google reCAPTCHA
  5. Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  6. No visible security headers detected
  7. No explicit incident response or security policy information
  8. WHOIS data privacy protection in place but domain age supports legitimacy
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, and Contact Form 7 with Google reCAPTCHA integration. The site loads with moderate performance and is optimized for mobile devices. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data implemented. The use of multiple JavaScript libraries and plugins indicates a feature-rich site but may introduce some technical debt if not regularly maintained. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with neocarrier.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review neocarrier.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.