Neo4j · Technology · United States
Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.
Neo4j is a leading technology company specializing in graph database and analytics platforms. Established in 2009, it offers a comprehensive suite of products including managed cloud services (AuraDB, Aura Graph Analytics), self-managed graph databases, and developer tools such as Neo4j Bloom and Cypher Query Language. The company targets developers, data scientists, and enterprises requiring advanced connected data solutions. Its market position is strong as a leader in graph databases with a large partner ecosystem and significant enterprise adoption. Technically, Neo4j.com is built on a modern WordPress CMS with a robust tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, and Visual Website Optimizer for analytics. The site is hosted likely on AWS infrastructure, optimized for mobile, and demonstrates excellent SEO and accessibility practices. Performance is moderate with room for improvement. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks some advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Cookie consent is implemented, but privacy policy and terms of service pages are not clearly linked on the homepage. Incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, indicating areas for compliance and security posture enhancement. Overall, Neo4j.com is a professional, trustworthy, and technically mature website supporting a reputable technology business. Strategic improvements in privacy transparency, security headers, and DNS security would further strengthen its security and compliance profile.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 10 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention neo4j.com, from OffSeq Breach.
12 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for neo4j.com.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with neo4j.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review neo4j.com.