Inforpol Net · Technology · Poland
High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.
Inforpol Net is a Polish technology company specializing in web design, domain registration, dedicated servers, IT services, programming, and online advertising. Established in 1996, the company has evolved from print directories to a comprehensive digital service provider with a strong local presence. Their market position is supported by a portfolio of over 1500 projects and more than 4500 satisfied clients, targeting primarily Polish businesses seeking professional IT and marketing solutions. The company holds a Google Partner certification, enhancing its credibility in digital advertising services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Bootstrap and jQuery, with integrations for Piwik PRO analytics and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices. Hosting appears to be managed via NDC-related domains, consistent with the company's service offerings. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. However, explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, showing a consistent and legitimate domain registration. Overall, Inforpol Net presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with good compliance and security posture. Strategic improvements in security headers and public security policies could further enhance their risk management and customer trust.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Detected services: Google Analytics, Cloudflare
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention ndc.pl, from OffSeq Breach.
8 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ndc.pl.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Domains that imitate ndc.pl and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.
Last checked 2026-06-20
See the full lookalike list
A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of ndc.pl with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.
Select it in the checkout above.
Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with ndc.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ndc.pl.