Skip to main content

Security report for ncr.com

NCR Corporation · Technology · N/a

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website for ncr.com serves as a landing page announcing the corporate split of NCR Corporation into two distinct entities: NCR Voyix and NCR Atleos. NCR Voyix focuses on providing digital commerce solutions to retailers and restaurants globally, while NCR Atleos specializes in expanding financial access through self-service channels and ATM network services. The site targets business clients in retail, restaurant, and financial sectors, positioning itself as a leading enterprise in technology-driven commerce and financial services. Technically, the site is built using Webflow CMS, hosted behind Cloudflare, and employs jQuery and Google Fonts. However, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not serve content over HTTPS, which is a critical security shortfall. Security headers are present but insufficient without proper SSL/TLS configuration. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are found, and no contact information or forms are provided, limiting user engagement and compliance transparency. Overall, the site demonstrates good design and branding consistency but requires significant improvements in security and privacy compliance to meet enterprise standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ncr.com

This scan found 11 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
90
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NCR Corporation's strategic decision to split into NCR Voyix and NCR Atleos reflects a focused approach to address distinct market segments: digital commerce and financial self-service solutions. This separation allows each entity to specialize and innovate within their domains, targeting retailers, restaurants, and financial institutions. The business model is B2B, providing technology and network services that enable clients to enhance customer experiences and financial access. The presence of trademark mentions and corporate branding signals established market presence and intellectual property protection. The lack of direct contact information on the landing page suggests a controlled communication channel, possibly directing users to the subsidiary sites for detailed engagement. The partnership ecosystem includes the two newly formed companies, which are critical to the overall corporate strategy.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS enforcement, exposing users to potential interception risks. While several security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are implemented, their effectiveness is undermined without secure transport. No vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE were detected, but the lack of TLS protocols and OCSP stapling indicates outdated or incomplete security configurations. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, further reduces compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. The site does not employ tracking or analytics scripts that could introduce privacy concerns, but also limits insight into user behavior. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and publication of security and privacy policies are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and configure OCSP stapling and session resumption.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and transparency.
  4. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  5. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. Hosting is provided via Cloudflare, which offers CDN and security features, though no active WAF blocking is detected. The site lacks performance metrics, but the use of modern web fonts and responsive design indicates good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic, with some focus-visible styles defined. SEO optimization is minimal but includes meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. The absence of SSL/TLS is a critical technical debt, exposing the site to security risks and reducing user trust. No analytics or marketing tools are detected, suggesting limited data collection and tracking. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but incomplete in security implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ncr.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ncr.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.