Dark web exposure
Add-onLeaked records that mention nceclusters.no, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for nceclusters.no right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Innovasjon Norge · Government · Norway
Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.
Norwegian Innovation Clusters (NIC) is a government-backed collaborative program managed by Innovasjon Norge in partnership with Siva and Forskningsrådet. The program aims to enhance cooperation and innovation among Norwegian companies to address challenges and build competitive advantages collectively. The website serves as an informational and engagement platform for Norwegian businesses involved in innovation clusters, offering program modules such as NIC Connect, NIC Explore, and NIC Impact. The site is well-branded, consistent, and professionally designed, targeting a Norwegian audience with clear contact information and partner links. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including React, Next.js, and Sanity CMS, ensuring good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, with a cookie consent mechanism implemented to comply with privacy regulations. However, explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages are not found, representing a compliance gap. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to .no domain privacy norms, but the association with official government agencies and consistent branding supports legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid security posture with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency. Strategically, the site should prioritize publishing comprehensive privacy and terms policies, implement security headers, and establish clear vulnerability disclosure channels to enhance trust and compliance. The technical infrastructure is modern and scalable, supporting the program's mission effectively.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention nceclusters.no, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for nceclusters.no right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with nceclusters.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nceclusters.no.