Skip to main content

Security report for nayoki.de

Nayoki Performance GmbH · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nayoki Performance GmbH is a small, Munich-based digital marketing agency specializing in performance marketing services. The company emphasizes know-how, creativity, and long-standing experience to drive client success. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting businesses seeking marketing expertise in the German market. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Astra theme, enhanced with Yoast SEO and Cookiebot for SEO and privacy compliance respectively. The infrastructure includes Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, with hosting and domain registration managed by reputable German providers. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers are recommended. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent but no visible privacy policy or terms of service pages. Overall, the website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and trustworthy, though it lacks some compliance documentation and explicit contact information. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, and improving transparency in contact details to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nayoki.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
45
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nayoki.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for nayoki.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nayoki Performance GmbH operates in the digital marketing sector, focusing on performance marketing services for clients primarily in Germany. The company leverages creativity and experience to differentiate itself in a competitive market. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting small to medium enterprises seeking marketing growth. The website's structured data and social media presence indicate a mature digital footprint. The absence of detailed contact information and compliance documents suggests areas for operational improvement. The company benefits from a stable domain registration dating back to 2004, reinforcing market presence and credibility. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data. The marketing tools and analytics integrations reflect a modern approach to client engagement and data-driven marketing strategies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent managed via Cookiebot, indicating awareness of GDPR requirements. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small agency but could be improved to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Create and publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to facilitate communication and support.
  5. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan, including a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nayoki Performance GmbH
Description
Mit Know-how, Kompetenz, Kreativität & langjähriger Erfahrung führen wir Sie zum Erfolg! Mehr erfahren...
Key services
Performance Marketing, Digital Marketing Consulting, Creative Marketing Solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Yoast SEO, Astra Theme
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and uses modern WordPress technologies.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the analyzed content.
  5. Social media links are present and point to official company profiles.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  8. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot scripts are used for analytics and consent management.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Astra theme, leveraging modern web technologies including jQuery and Google Tag Manager. SEO is enhanced via Yoast SEO plugin, and privacy compliance is supported by Cookiebot. Hosting and domain registration are managed by reputable German providers, ensuring stable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. However, there is room for improvement in security configurations and compliance documentation. The technical stack is appropriate for a small digital agency but should be regularly updated and audited to mitigate risks and maintain performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nayoki.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nayoki.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.