Skip to main content

Security report for navyrovne.cz

Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website navyrovne.jecool.net serves as a community portal for the residents and unit owners of a residential building, providing updates, committee information, document archives, and a communication platform. It is built on WordPress with standard plugins and a dated theme, indicating a small-scale, community-focused operation. The technical infrastructure is basic but functional, with moderate performance and limited mobile optimization. Security posture is minimal, lacking key security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. No contact or business registration information is provided, reducing business credibility. The domain is a subdomain of jecool.net, with no WHOIS data available for the subdomain itself, which is typical but limits domain registration trust signals. Overall, the site is safe and appropriate for general audiences but requires improvements in security and compliance to enhance trust and protection.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching navyrovne.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

This site targets a niche audience of residents and unit owners within a specific residential building in the Czech Republic. It operates as an informational and communication hub rather than a commercial business. The business model is community service-oriented with no evident revenue streams or partnerships. The lack of formal business information and contact details suggests a volunteer or informal management structure. Growth potential is limited to the resident community. The site relies on WordPress and basic plugins, indicating low technical complexity and limited digital maturity.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low. The site lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. The use of captcha on forms is a positive control to reduce spam. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of HTTPS confirmation in the data is a concern, though URLs suggest HTTP. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls, formal policies, and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  3. Publish a clear privacy policy and cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR.
  4. Provide contact information including an email address for general and security inquiries.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Web serving unit owners and residents of a residential building, providing updates, committee activities, documents archive, and communication for building-related issues.
Key services
Information sharing about building activities, Document archiving, Communication platform for residents
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.9.12, jQuery 3.6.0, Captcha plugin, Theme My Login plugin, Twenty Thirteen theme
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of captcha plugin to protect forms
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URLs but not confirmed in data)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based community portal for a residential building in Czech Republic.
  2. No WHOIS data for the subdomain; domain navyrovne.jecool.net is a subdomain of jecool.net.
  3. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Content is safe and appropriate for general audience.
  8. Website uses standard WordPress plugins and theme from 2015 era.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress 5.9.12 with the Twenty Thirteen theme and several plugins including captcha and theme-my-login. The site loads jQuery 3.6.0 and uses Google Fonts. The HTML is valid and includes meta viewport for responsiveness, but mobile optimization is basic. SEO is minimal with basic meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization techniques observed. Accessibility features are basic with some screen reader text present. The site is hosted as a subdomain under jecool.net, with no hosting provider identified. Technical debt is moderate due to dated theme and limited modern practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with navyrovne.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review navyrovne.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.