Skip to main content

Security report for navvis.com

NavVis GmbH · Technology · Germany

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NavVis GmbH is a technology company specializing in advanced reality capture and digital twin solutions, serving industries such as surveying, construction, manufacturing, and process plants. The company offers a combination of hardware products like the NavVis MLX and VLX series, alongside software platforms such as NavVis IVION, enabling clients to capture, process, and access spatial data efficiently. NavVis positions itself as an innovative leader in handheld and wearable laser scanning technology with a strong B2B focus. Technically, the website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, integrating modern analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Matomo, Hotjar, and Usercentrics for privacy compliance. The site is well-optimized for SEO, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, featuring structured data and comprehensive cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configurations and includes standard security headers. Forms are protected with reCAPTCHA, and no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of explicit incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies represents an area for improvement. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, technical maturity, and privacy compliance, though the lack of WHOIS transparency slightly impacts trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include publishing terms of service, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure details to enhance security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching navvis.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NavVis operates in a competitive technology market focused on reality capture and digital twin solutions. Its business model revolves around selling hardware devices, software subscriptions, and enterprise services to industrial clients. The company leverages partnerships and maintains a strong online presence across multiple social media platforms. Revenue streams likely include product sales, software licenses, and service contracts. The target customer segments are professional surveyors, construction firms, manufacturers, and process plant operators. Growth indicators include frequent content updates, events, and a comprehensive resource library. The partnership ecosystem includes certified resellers and solution partners, supporting global reach and market penetration.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented. Privacy compliance is supported by a cookie consent banner and Usercentrics CMP integration. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published incident response contact or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency and preparedness. GDPR compliance appears well addressed through privacy policies and consent mechanisms. The security culture is indicated by the use of reCAPTCHA on forms and adherence to best practices in data protection. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be enhanced by adding explicit incident response and disclosure information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated incident response contact page or email to improve transparency and readiness.
  2. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Create and publish a terms of service page to complete legal documentation and user agreements.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance WHOIS transparency or provide domain registration verification to improve trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
NavVis GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NavVis GmbH
Description
NavVis provides ground-breaking reality capture technology enabling accurate scanning of complex sites at scale and digital twin solutions for various industries.
Key services
Reality capture hardware (NavVis MLX, VLX 2, VLX 3), Software solutions (NavVis IVION platform), Enterprise reality capture services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, Hotjar, Usercentrics CMP, Weglot translation, Plyr video player
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Matomo, Hotjar
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Usercentrics CMP, Weglot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and targeted at B2B industrial and technology sectors.
  3. Strong use of structured data and SEO best practices.
  4. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or privacy protected, which slightly impacts trust.
  6. No explicit terms of service or incident response contacts found.
  7. Multiple analytics and marketing tools are in use, with moderate user tracking.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies and third-party integrations for analytics, marketing, and privacy compliance. The tech stack includes Google Tag Manager, Matomo, Hotjar, Usercentrics CMP, Weglot for translations, and Plyr for video playback. The site demonstrates good performance and mobile optimization, with structured data for SEO and accessibility features. No significant technical debt or outdated components were detected. Hosting details are not explicitly identified but likely managed by HubSpot. The website is well-maintained with frequent content updates and a professional design.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with navvis.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review navvis.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.