Skip to main content

Security report for navarra.es

Gobierno de Navarra · Government · Spain

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website navarra.es serves as the official digital portal for the Gobierno de Navarra, providing comprehensive information, services, and electronic procedures to citizens and residents of the Navarra region in Spain. It holds a strong market position as the authoritative government source, offering key services such as tax information, employment opportunities, health services, and citizen attention. The site targets a broad audience including individuals, businesses, and public sector stakeholders within the region. Technically, the site is built on the Liferay CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Alloy UI. It integrates multiple analytics platforms such as Google Analytics, Matomo, and Quantum Metric to monitor user interactions and improve service delivery. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, contributing to a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and employs standard security best practices. However, it lacks visible security policies, incident response contacts, and a cookie consent mechanism, which are important for compliance and user trust. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, navarra.es is a well-maintained government portal with high trustworthiness and professional presentation. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency would further enhance its posture and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching navarra.es

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gobierno de Navarra operates as a regional government entity providing digital access to public services and information. Its business model focuses on facilitating citizen engagement and administrative efficiency through online platforms. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a broad service portfolio covering economic activity, social rights, health, education, and more. The portal supports government transparency and communication, reinforced by official social media channels and legal compliance documentation. Growth indicators include continuous content updates and integration of advanced analytics. Partnerships appear limited to government-related entities, with no commercial affiliations detected.

Security posture

The security maturity of navarra.es is solid, with HTTPS enforced and no evident exposure of sensitive information. The use of multiple analytics tools is balanced with privacy considerations, though the absence of a cookie consent banner is a compliance gap. Security headers are minimal, suggesting room for enhancement with CSP and other headers. No published security or incident response policies reduce transparency and preparedness perception. The site does not expose vulnerable libraries or insecure forms. Overall, the risk level is low but could be improved by adopting comprehensive security policies and user-facing disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gobierno de Navarra
Description
La información, servicios y trámites del Gobierno de Navarra
Key services
Electronic procedures (Sede electrónica), Citizen attention and contact, Government information and news, Thematic services (e.g., Hacienda, Empleo, Salud)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap, Liferay Portal, AUI (Alloy UI), Google Analytics, Matomo, Quantum Metric
Frameworks
Liferay, Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of analytics with privacy considerations

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo, Quantum Metric
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Quantum Metric
Marketing tools
AddToAny
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official regional government website with comprehensive public services
  2. Uses multiple analytics platforms with privacy considerations
  3. No cookie consent banner detected, which is recommended
  4. Good mobile and accessibility support
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information published
  6. Uses Liferay CMS platform with modern frontend technologies
  7. Social media presence is official and consistent
Technical notes

Notes

The website utilizes Liferay CMS, a robust enterprise portal framework, combined with Bootstrap and jQuery for responsive and interactive UI components. The tech stack is modern and well-integrated, supporting good accessibility and SEO standards. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in script loading and resource management. The site is mobile-friendly and includes ARIA roles and labels for accessibility. Technical risks are low, but reliance on multiple third-party analytics scripts requires ongoing security monitoring. Hosting details are not explicitly identified but the SSL configuration is excellent, indicating professional infrastructure management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with navarra.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review navarra.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.