Skip to main content

Security report for nationaleparken.nl

Nationale Parken · Government · Netherlands

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nationaleparken.nl is an authoritative informational website dedicated to showcasing the national parks of the Netherlands. It provides educational content, news, and a knowledge platform aimed at the general public interested in nature and conservation. The website is professionally designed using Drupal 10 and integrates modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. The domain is well-established since 2003, reinforcing its credibility and trustworthiness. Security practices are generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers and DNSSEC could be improved. Contact is primarily via a contact form, with no direct emails or phone numbers published. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with good privacy compliance and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nationaleparken.nl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
40
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as a non-profit or governmental platform focused on environmental education and awareness of Dutch national parks. Its market position is strong as an official source of information, targeting a broad audience including nature enthusiasts and the general public. The business model is informational, supported by partnerships with trusted third-party services for analytics and cookie management. The absence of direct contact details suggests a focus on streamlined communication via forms. The site’s longevity and consistent branding indicate stable operations and a clear mission. There is potential to enhance transparency by publishing terms of service and security policies.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Cookie consent is actively managed, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of DNSSEC and some common security headers represents an area for improvement. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which could be a gap in security readiness. The use of reputable third-party services reduces risk, but the site would benefit from formalizing security policies and incident response procedures to enhance trust and preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Consider adding direct contact information such as a dedicated security or support email to improve communication channels.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nationale Parken
Description
Website dedicated to the national parks of the Netherlands, showcasing characteristic nature areas, unique plants and animals, and stories about the parks. It serves as an informational and educational platform about Dutch national parks.
Key services
Information about national parks, Educational content, News and updates, Contact and knowledge platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Typekit fonts
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable third-party services (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot tracking
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Drupal 10 CMS with modern frontend technologies.
  2. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories and user controls.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact is via contact form.
  4. No terms of service page detected.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. External links mostly to trusted domains related to analytics, cookie management, and video content.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Website is well-structured and professionally designed.
  9. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely supported CMS, ensuring a solid technical foundation. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot indicates a mature approach to analytics and privacy compliance. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting is provided by Combell B.V., a reputable provider. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization. The absence of DNSSEC and some security headers suggests minor technical debt in security hardening. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nationaleparken.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nationaleparken.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.