Skip to main content

Security report for nationalarchives.gov.uk

The National Archives · Government · United Kingdom

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The National Archives is the official UK government archive and publisher for England and Wales, providing extensive archival preservation, public access to government records, educational resources, and research support. The website serves a broad audience including researchers, educators, government officials, and the general public interested in UK history. It holds a strong market position as the authoritative government archival institution. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools, delivering a well-structured, mobile-optimized, and accessible user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though improvements could be made by adding security headers and updating legacy libraries. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with privacy regulations.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of nationalarchives.gov.uk. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nationalarchives.gov.uk

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
93
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nationalarchives.gov.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,656
Employees
0
Customers
1,620
Third parties
36
Weak passwords
7%

13 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nationalarchives.gov.uk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The National Archives operates as a large government entity focused on archival and publishing services. Its business model centers on providing public access to historical government records, supporting education, and hosting exhibitions and events. The organization leverages partnerships with related domains for catalog search and merchandise. The website's content quality and branding consistency reinforce its authoritative position. The absence of WHOIS data is typical for government domains and does not detract from legitimacy. The site’s integration with social media and marketing tools indicates a mature digital presence aimed at engagement and outreach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, cookie consent banners, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. The use of an outdated jQuery version could pose risks if not regularly audited. No incident response or security policy pages were found, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the site balances security with usability but should address these gaps to strengthen defenses and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to HTTP responses.
  3. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to latest secure versions.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  5. Continue regular security audits of third-party scripts and plugins.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
The National Archives
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The National Archives
Description
We are a non-ministerial department, and the official archive and publisher for the UK Government, and for England and Wales.
Key services
Archival preservation, Public access to government records, Educational resources, Research support, Exhibitions and events
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.3, Modernizr 2.8.3, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, DS Cookie Consent plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with accept/reject options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government official archive site with comprehensive content and resources.
  2. No WHOIS data available, likely due to privacy or registry restrictions.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  4. No visible security headers in HTML but HTTPS is enforced.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  6. No forms detected on the homepage; cookie consent banner includes accept/reject buttons.
  7. Multiple official social media links present.
  8. No incident response or security policy pages explicitly found.
  9. Content is rich, well-structured, and professionally presented.
Technical notes

Notes

The site is powered by WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin and uses jQuery 1.11.3 and Modernizr 2.8.3 libraries. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, likely due to large images and legacy scripts. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. The site uses a cookie consent plugin with accept/reject options, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. Technical debt is moderate due to older JavaScript libraries and missing security headers, presenting opportunities for modernization and improved security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 75/100Medium28 findingsView report
  3. 75/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nationalarchives.gov.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nationalarchives.gov.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.