Skip to main content

Security report for nationaalpark-dwingelderveld.nl

Provincie Drenthe · Government · Netherlands

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nationaal Park Dwingelderveld is a governmental nature conservation entity managed under the Province of Drenthe in the Netherlands. The website serves as an informational portal for visitors and residents, providing details about the park's natural features, activities, and events. It holds a strong position as a key regional nature park within the Dutch National Parks network, focusing on wet heathland preservation and public engagement. The site offers comprehensive visitor information, event calendars, and accessibility guidelines, targeting a broad audience including tourists, local residents, and nature enthusiasts. Technically, the website is built on the iprox CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. It integrates Google Analytics 4 for visitor tracking with a clear cookie consent mechanism, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, contributing to a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, implements standard security headers, and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available, indicating room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. The domain registration aligns well with the website's governmental nature, reinforcing its legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the website presents a professional, secure, and user-friendly platform that effectively supports the park's mission and visitor engagement. Strategic enhancements in security policy disclosure and vulnerability management would further strengthen its security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nationaalpark-dwingelderveld.nl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nationaalpark-dwingelderveld.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for nationaalpark-dwingelderveld.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nationaal Park Dwingelderveld operates within the governmental and non-profit sectors, focusing on nature conservation and public education. Its market positioning as a prominent national park in Drenthe leverages unique natural assets such as the largest wet heathland in Western Europe. The business model centers on conservation efforts, visitor services, and community engagement, supported by provincial government funding. Key revenue streams likely include governmental budgets and possibly grants or partnerships. The target customer segments encompass local residents, tourists, schools, and nature enthusiasts. The website's partnership ecosystem includes provincial authorities, national park networks, and European conservation organizations, enhancing credibility and resource sharing. Growth indicators include active event programming and digital engagement through multimedia content. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining strong governmental ties and expanding digital outreach to sustain visitor interest and conservation goals.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. The presence of a cookie consent banner and privacy policy indicates compliance with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests limited transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The use of Google Analytics 4 is managed with consent, balancing analytics needs and privacy. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced documentation and proactive vulnerability management to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Designate and publish contact information for a Data Protection Officer or security contact to enhance compliance and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance security headers with additional directives such as Referrer-Policy and Permissions-Policy for improved protection.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Provincie Drenthe
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Provincie Drenthe
Description
Nationaal Park Dwingelderveld is a nature reserve in Zuidwest-Drenthe, the largest contiguous wet heathland in Western Europe, offering visitors opportunities for walking, cycling, horse riding, and nature experiences.
Key services
Nature conservation, Visitor information and education, Event organization, Accessibility information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
iprox CMS, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Analytics 4
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics 4
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to nature conservation and visitor information.
  3. Strong alignment between domain registration and website content.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and linked.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policies publicly found.
  6. Use of Google Analytics 4 for visitor tracking with consent mechanism.
  7. Multiple official partner links and logos present, enhancing trust.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the iprox CMS platform, leveraging modern web standards including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. It integrates Google Analytics 4 via Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking, with a cookie consent mechanism ensuring privacy compliance. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features, contributing to a positive user experience. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times and resource management. The technical infrastructure appears stable and well-maintained, with no visible technical debt or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to modernize further by adopting advanced security headers and enhancing SEO metadata. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nationaalpark-dwingelderveld.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nationaalpark-dwingelderveld.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.