Skip to main content

Security report for nataliatriantafylli.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website nataliatriantafylli.com serves as a personal portfolio for artist and photographer Natalia Triantafylli, showcasing her visual artwork and photography. The site is built on the Cargo Collective platform, featuring a clean and consistent design optimized for mobile devices. It targets art enthusiasts and potential collaborators, focusing on artistic exposure rather than commercial transactions. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery, with web fonts for typography. Hosting and domain registration are consistent and reputable, with HTTPS enabled ensuring secure connections. However, the site lacks privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security incident response details, which are important for compliance and trust. No advanced security headers or analytics tools are detected, indicating a basic security posture. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nataliatriantafylli.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

This is a small-scale personal portfolio website without e-commerce or extensive business operations. The business model is centered on personal branding and artistic presentation. The market position is niche, targeting a specific audience interested in contemporary art and photography. There are no visible revenue streams or partnerships indicated. The site is relatively new, registered in early 2023, aligning with the likely recent start of the artist's online presence. The lack of business contact details and certifications suggests a sole proprietorship or individual artist rather than a corporate entity. Growth potential depends on artistic recognition and external promotion, with Instagram as the primary social media channel.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection. However, it lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and documented security policies. No forms or data collection mechanisms reduce exposure to input-based attacks, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, especially regarding GDPR. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, limiting the ability to handle security incidents effectively. The site does not use analytics or tracking scripts, minimizing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a personal portfolio but not for handling sensitive data or commercial transactions.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and build user trust.
  4. Add contact information and a dedicated security incident response channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Consider integrating basic analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to understand visitor behavior and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal or portfolio website showcasing visual artwork and photography by Natalia Triantafylli.
Key services
Art portfolio display, Photography showcase
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 2.1.3, Handlebars.js, Cargo Collective platform, Web fonts (Diatype, Monument Grotesk Mono)
Platforms
Cargo Collective
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal portfolio for artist Natalia Triantafylli.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. No forms detected for user input or data collection.
  5. Site uses Cargo Collective platform with standard scripts and fonts.
  6. HTTPS is enabled and domain registrar is reputable.
  7. No advanced security headers or policies detected.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. Social media link to Instagram present.
  10. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on the Cargo Collective platform, which provides a stable and modern infrastructure. The tech stack includes HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 2.1.3, and Handlebars.js templating. Web fonts from Dinamo Typefaces are used for typography, enhancing visual appeal. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with some lazy loading of images. No heavy third-party scripts or advertising networks are present, reducing load times and privacy concerns. However, the absence of security headers and DNSSEC indicates areas for technical improvement. The domain is registered via eNom, LLC, with clientTransferProhibited status, adding a layer of domain security. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a personal portfolio but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nataliatriantafylli.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nataliatriantafylli.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.