Skip to main content

Security report for nasljedje.org

Lanaco · Government · Bosnia and Herzegovina

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents the official online presence of the Republika Srpska Institute for the Protection of Cultural-Historical and Natural Heritage, a government agency under the Ministry of Education and Culture of Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina. It provides information on cultural and natural heritage protection, public procurement, news, projects, and contact details. The site targets the general public, cultural professionals, and government stakeholders. The business model is a government service institution focused on heritage preservation and public information dissemination. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Slider Revolution and Unyson Framework, using jQuery and Bootstrap for frontend functionality. The site is mobile-optimized with moderate performance and basic SEO and accessibility features. Hosting details are not explicitly stated but domain registration and DNS indicate a stable infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. No privacy or cookie policies are found, indicating compliance gaps. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing trust. No signs of malicious content or adult material are present. Overall, the website is a credible government resource with good content and moderate technical maturity. Improvements in privacy compliance and security hardening are recommended to enhance trust and protect user data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nasljedje.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institution holds a strong market position as the official government body responsible for cultural and natural heritage protection in Republika Srpska. Its competitive advantage lies in its official mandate and government backing. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on regulatory, preservation, and informational services. Revenue streams are likely government-funded. The target customer segments include government agencies, cultural heritage professionals, researchers, and the general public interested in heritage. The website shows active engagement through news and project updates, indicating ongoing operations and growth. Partnerships with other government and cultural organizations are evident through linked domains and references. Strategic observations suggest a focus on transparency and public engagement, though privacy and security policies need enhancement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer lock enabled. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks a security.txt file or explicit incident response contact channels, which limits its readiness for vulnerability reporting and incident handling. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is not clearly addressed, as no privacy or cookie policies are present. Overall, the security posture is functional but could benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to patch known vulnerabilities and maintain security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Lanaco
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lanaco
Description
Републички завод за заштиту културно-историјског и природног насљеђа је републичка управна организација у саставу Министарства просвјете и културе Републике Српске, која се бави заштитом културног и природног насљеђа.
Key services
Cultural heritage protection, Natural heritage protection, Public procurement announcements, Information access, Corruption reporting, Project implementation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Slider Revolution, Unyson Framework, Font Awesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress, Unyson
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status to prevent unauthorized transfers

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official government cultural heritage institution site
  2. Content is primarily in Serbian Cyrillic
  3. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found
  4. Contact information is clearly provided
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure
  6. Uses WordPress with common plugins and themes
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected
  8. Good use of HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS with popular plugins and themes, including Slider Revolution and Unyson Framework, supported by jQuery and Bootstrap for responsive design. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and Font Awesome. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images and responsive layouts. The technical stack is standard for government informational sites but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Hosting provider details are not explicit but domain registration and DNS suggest a stable environment. There is no evidence of modern frontend frameworks or advanced caching mechanisms. Technical risks include potential outdated plugins and missing security headers, which could impact operational security and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nasljedje.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nasljedje.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.