Skip to main content

Security report for nasjesenik.cz

město Jeseník · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website nasjesenik.cz serves as the official digital presence for the city of Jeseník in the Czech Republic. It provides residents and visitors with information about city projects, news updates, strategic plans, and public services. The site is well-branded with consistent city logos and offers a user-friendly experience with clear navigation and search functionality. The target audience primarily includes local residents and stakeholders interested in municipal developments. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Mapbox for interactive maps. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized and includes cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and integrates consent management for analytics. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were detected in the analyzed content. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent present but no visible privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, suitable for a municipal government entity. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and terms of service documents, enhancing security headers, and providing clear contact information for security incidents to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nasjesenik.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nasjesenik.cz operates as a government municipal portal for the city of Jeseník, focusing on transparency and citizen engagement through project updates and news. Its competitive advantage lies in official endorsement and localized content tailored to the community. The business model is informational and service-oriented, with no direct revenue streams evident. The site targets local residents, municipal employees, and visitors. Growth indicators include active project reporting and strategic planning visibility. The partnership ecosystem includes Google services and Cloudflare for infrastructure. The site maintains a consistent brand aligned with city identity, supporting its authoritative position in the local market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and integration of cookie consent for analytics tracking. The absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, limiting transparency for security researchers. Incident response contact information is not provided, which could delay handling of security issues. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided content. Compliance with GDPR is partial, mainly through cookie consent but lacking detailed privacy documentation. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a municipal site but could be enhanced with standard best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publish a security policy or security.txt file with incident response contact details.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards for inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
město Jeseník
Description
Official website of the city Jeseník, providing information about city projects, news, strategic plans, and services for residents and visitors.
Key services
City news and updates, Project information and progress, Strategic planning documents, Public services information, Search functionality
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Mapbox GL JS, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, Cookie Script
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent management
  • Cookie consent script implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official city website with clear project and news information
  2. Uses modern web technologies and analytics
  3. Cookie consent implemented
  4. Lacks explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in provided content
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. Good SSL and hosting infrastructure via Cloudflare
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and standard technology stack including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript libraries such as Mapbox GL JS and FontAwesome. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking and marketing purposes, with cookie consent implemented. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing CDN and DNS services that enhance performance and security. The site is mobile responsive and includes SEO-friendly meta tags. However, no specific CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images and asynchronous script loading. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and explicitly define security headers to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nasjesenik.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nasjesenik.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.