Skip to main content

Security report for napoleonsportsandcasino.be

Combell nv · E-commerce · Belgium

Partial score · DNS & email only

69/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Napoleon is an established online betting platform primarily serving the Belgian market, offering sports betting and casino gaming services. The website positions itself as a leading site for online betting in Belgium, targeting adult users interested in gambling. The business is registered with Combell nv since 2011, indicating a mature presence in the industry. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks, uses HTTPS, and integrates consent management tools to comply with privacy regulations. However, some standard security headers and explicit contact or policy pages are missing, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the site demonstrates a good balance of business functionality and technical implementation, with moderate tracking and advertising practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching napoleonsportsandcasino.be

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Email security
65
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
69

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the e-commerce sector focused on online gambling, leveraging a business model based on betting and casino games. Its market position is strong within Belgium, supported by a domain age of over a decade. The platform uses third-party services like Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for analytics and consent management, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. The absence of visible contact information or detailed terms of service on the homepage suggests potential areas for transparency improvement. The business likely targets adult gamblers in Belgium, with compliance to GDPR indicated by cookie consent mechanisms.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent banners, which are positive security and privacy practices. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Add and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear terms of service and security policy pages accessible from the homepage.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including security incident response contacts.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Combell nv
Description
Online betting platform focused on the Belgian market offering casino and sports betting services.
Key services
online sports betting, online casino games
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Consent Management, Fastly CDN
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript frameworks
  2. Cookie consent banner is implemented with OneTrust
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage HTML
  4. No terms of service or security policy pages detected
  5. WHOIS data shows domain registered since 2011 with Combell nv
  6. External scripts mainly for analytics and consent management
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript framework likely Vue.js, with asynchronous loading of Google Tag Manager and OneTrust scripts for analytics and cookie consent. Hosting is supported by Fastly CDN, which should provide good performance and availability. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. However, SEO and accessibility features appear basic, and no CMS is explicitly detected. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with napoleonsportsandcasino.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review napoleonsportsandcasino.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.