Skip to main content

Security report for napoleonsports.be

E-commerce · Belgium

Partial score · DNS & email only

50/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Napoleonsports.be is an online betting platform focused on the Belgian market, offering sports betting and casino games. The website positions itself as the leading online betting site in Belgium, targeting adult users interested in gambling. The technical infrastructure leverages modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js, uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, and implements cookie consent via OneTrust, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the site lacks visible privacy policies and terms of service in the provided HTML snapshot, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and explicit incident response contacts. Overall, the site is functional but could improve transparency and security practices to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of napoleonsports.be. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching napoleonsports.be

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the regulated online gambling sector in Belgium, a competitive market with strict compliance requirements. Its business model revolves around online sports betting and casino games, generating revenue through betting margins and player engagement. The company appears to be medium-sized, founded in 2017, with a focus on Belgian customers. The presence of related domains such as napoleongames.be suggests a broader ecosystem of gaming services. The lack of visible contact information and compliance documentation may impact customer confidence and regulatory standing. Strategic partnerships and technology investments indicate a commitment to growth and market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency in security management. The lack of visible privacy policy and terms of service is a compliance gap under GDPR and related regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the snapshot. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements in policy transparency and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service documents accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information for customer support and security incident reporting.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate risks.
  5. Enhance transparency around data protection practices and compliance with GDPR.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Online betting platform targeting Belgian users, offering sports betting and casino games.
Key services
Sports betting, Casino games, Online gambling
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Webpack, RxJS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a functional online betting platform targeting Belgium.
  2. No visible privacy policy or terms of service on the main page HTML.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via OneTrust.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Uses modern JavaScript frameworks and tracking technologies.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL is enabled.
  7. No forms detected in the provided HTML snapshot.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  9. Content is minimal in the snapshot but likely dynamically loaded via JavaScript.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based frontend likely built with Vue.js, bundled with Webpack, and includes RxJS for reactive programming. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking, alongside OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site loads multiple remote scripts from related domains, indicating a modular architecture. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and mobile optimization evident. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly found beyond the registrar. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic, with room for improvement in metadata and structured data presence. The technical stack supports scalability but requires enhancements in security headers and compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium26 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with napoleonsports.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review napoleonsports.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.