Skip to main content

Security report for nanobit.com

Nanobit · Technology · Croatia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nanobit is a well-established technology company specializing in game development, with a domain age of over 23 years reflecting its long-standing market presence. The company targets gamers and potential employees, offering a portfolio of games and career opportunities. The website is professionally designed using modern technologies such as Angular and Bootstrap, providing a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain protections in place, though improvements can be made by enabling DNSSEC and publishing explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is addressed with a cookie consent mechanism and accessible privacy and terms of service pages. Overall, the website demonstrates high business credibility and trustworthiness with strong social media presence and consistent branding.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nanobit.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nanobit operates in the technology sector focused on game development and publishing. The company leverages a business model centered on creating engaging games and attracting talent through career opportunities. Its market position is supported by a mature domain and professional digital presence. The company maintains active social media channels to engage with its audience and promote its offerings. The integration of BambooHR indicates a structured HR process. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent medium-sized enterprise based in Croatia.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited status. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR compliance, but vulnerability disclosure and security.txt files are absent. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for enhancement in DNS security and policy publication.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact channels.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Continue maintaining and enhancing privacy compliance mechanisms and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nanobit
Description
Nanobit is a technology company specializing in game development, offering a portfolio of games and career opportunities in the gaming industry.
Key services
Game development, Publishing, Career opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular (ng-version=15.2.9), Bootstrap 4 grid, YouTube iframe API, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Google Fonts
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientDeleteProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
BambooHR (HR software integration)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with clear user options.
  4. No direct company emails or phone numbers found in HTML content; contact likely via forms or social media.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  7. Social media presence is strong with multiple verified platforms linked.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond HR software integration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Angular 15 with Bootstrap 4 grid system, leveraging modern web fonts and animations (AOS). It uses external resources from Google Fonts, jsDelivr CDN, and YouTube APIs. Hosting and domain registration are managed via GoDaddy with custom nameservers. Performance is moderate with some asynchronous script loading and deferred scripts. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO optimization is present but could be improved with more meta tags and structured data. No CMS detected, indicating a custom or framework-based site. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nanobit.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nanobit.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.