Skip to main content

Security report for nandptyres.co.uk

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.nandptyres.co.uk appears to represent a small business related to tyres and automotive services, hosted on the Wix platform. However, the domain WHOIS lookup failed due to a naming rules violation, indicating the domain is not properly registered or is invalid. The website content is minimal, primarily consisting of Wix-generated code and lacks substantive business information, contact details, or privacy and cookie policies. Technically, the site uses Wix's Thunderbolt framework and standard web technologies but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. The security posture is basic with no explicit vulnerabilities detected but also no strong security practices evident. Overall, the website's legitimacy and trustworthiness are questionable due to the domain registration issues and lack of business transparency. Strategic improvements are needed in domain registration, privacy compliance, and contact information to enhance credibility and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nandptyres.co.uk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
59
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind the website seems to be a small UK-based tyre retailer or service provider, but no explicit company name, registration, or contact information is available on the site. The market positioning and business model cannot be confidently assessed due to lack of content. The site targets general consumers looking for tyre services. There is no evidence of partnerships, certifications, or growth indicators. The business intelligence is limited by the absence of verifiable business data and domain legitimacy concerns.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is low to basic. The site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. No incident response or security policy information is provided. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of security best practices and domain registration issues reduce trust. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not demonstrated. The site does not provide mechanisms for vulnerability disclosure or security contact points, indicating limited security culture and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Register a valid domain name compliant with Nominet UK rules to establish legitimacy.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers.
  4. Implement security headers and improve SSL/TLS configuration to enhance security posture.
  5. Establish incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures to build trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Wix, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Wix Thunderbolt
Platforms
Wix.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix hosting and scripts.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available due to domain naming rules violation.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the content.
  5. No security policies, incident response contacts, or certifications found.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files detected.
  7. Website content is minimal and mostly technical Wix boilerplate with no substantive business information.
  8. No external business partner or subsidiary domains identified.
  9. No advertising or tracking services detected beyond Wix standard scripts.
  10. Website content is safe and non-adult.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform using the Thunderbolt rendering engine, leveraging modern JavaScript and CSS technologies. Hosting is provided by Wix with standard CDN and static asset delivery. Performance is moderate with some optimizations possible. Mobile optimization is good due to Wix's responsive design features. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is minimal with no structured data or Open Graph metadata detected. The site lacks advanced analytics or marketing tools. Technical debt appears low but the site is limited in content and business functionality.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nandptyres.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nandptyres.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.