Skip to main content

Security report for naml.no

Other · Norway

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.naml.no represents a Norwegian entity with a professional web presence focused on providing organizational or business-related services. The site uses modern web technologies including HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot protection, Microsoft Application Insights for analytics, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The content is primarily in Norwegian and the site demonstrates good design quality and user experience with clear navigation and mobile optimization. However, explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages are not clearly found, and no direct contact information such as emails or phone numbers are visible, which slightly impacts transparency and user trust. Technically, the site employs a modern tech stack with standard web technologies and integrates third-party services for analytics and marketing. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and bot protection in place, but the absence of explicit security headers and detailed privacy documentation suggests room for improvement. The WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection, which is common but reduces the ability to verify domain ownership and age. Overall, the website is secure and professional but could enhance trust and compliance by publishing clear privacy and terms policies and providing contact details. The domain's privacy-protected WHOIS is not unusual but should be monitored for legitimacy. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected, and the site is safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching naml.no

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind www.naml.no appears to be a small Norwegian entity operating in an unspecified sector, likely providing services or information to a Norwegian audience. The lack of explicit business details, such as company name or registration info on the site, limits detailed business intelligence. The site uses trusted third-party services for analytics and marketing, indicating a focus on data-driven insights and user engagement. The absence of contact information and detailed policies suggests a low-profile or informational business model rather than a direct sales or e-commerce platform. The use of Microsoft and Google services points to integration with global technology ecosystems. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly mentioned.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted communications. The integration of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise helps mitigate automated bot attacks. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the site lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to harden security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency. Overall, the site is secure but could improve by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing security-related documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Add explicit security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy) to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and user support.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Consider publishing a security policy and incident response contact to demonstrate security maturity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Microsoft Application Insights, Cookiebot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot protection
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Application Insights, Siteimprove
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google, Microsoft
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Siteimprove, Microsoft Application Insights
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Microsoft Application Insights, Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS and modern security tools
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and detailed
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found or linked
  5. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection
  6. Website content is in Norwegian language
  7. Use of Microsoft and Google services for analytics and security
  8. No signs of malware or phishing detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It integrates Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot mitigation and Microsoft Application Insights for telemetry and analytics. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management, indicating attention to privacy compliance. The site appears to be mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced performance optimizations detected. No CMS or hosting provider information was found. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA roles and labels present but no detailed accessibility compliance information. SEO optimization is basic with canonical links and meta tags but no structured data or rich snippets detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with naml.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review naml.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.