Skip to main content

Security report for nami.org

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website nami.org is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Turnstile CAPTCHA security challenge, preventing access to any substantive content. The domain is long-established, registered since 1996 with Network Solutions, LLC, and uses Cloudflare for DNS and security services. Due to the blocking mechanism, no business, contact, or policy information is available for analysis. The technical infrastructure indicates use of modern security tools like Cloudflare's WAF and CAPTCHA to protect the site from automated threats. However, this also limits the ability to assess the website's content quality, security posture, and compliance status. Overall, the site appears legitimate based on domain age and registrar data, but the lack of accessible content restricts further evaluation.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nami.org

This scan found 13 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
Average
80
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Given the absence of accessible content, no direct business intelligence can be derived. The domain age suggests a mature entity, potentially a well-known organization. The use of Cloudflare indicates a focus on security and performance. Without visible business descriptions, services, or contact details, no insights into market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships can be confidently provided.

Security posture

The presence of a Cloudflare WAF and Turnstile CAPTCHA indicates a proactive security posture aimed at mitigating automated attacks and abuse. However, no security headers or detailed security policies are visible in the provided content. The domain registration status with clientTransferProhibited adds a layer of domain security. Due to content blocking, no vulnerabilities or compliance gaps can be identified. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not available.

Recommendations

  1. Reduce or customize WAF challenge settings to allow legitimate security scanners and users to access content for analysis.
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies accessible without security challenges.
  3. Provide visible contact information and security incident response contacts on public pages.
  4. Implement and expose security headers and compliance statements to improve trust and transparency.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. The HTML content is a Cloudflare Turnstile CAPTCHA challenge page blocking access to the actual website content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to Cloudflare security challenge.
  2. No business or contact information is visible in the provided HTML.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the content.
  4. No forms or data collection fields are present in the challenge page.
  5. No social media or external business-related links found except Cloudflare domains.
  6. No security headers or meta tags visible in the provided HTML snippet.
  7. The domain is old and registered with a reputable registrar, indicating legitimacy.
  8. Analysis is incomplete due to WAF/security mechanisms. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Cloudflare as a hosting and security provider, leveraging their DNS and Turnstile CAPTCHA for bot mitigation. The HTML content is minimal and serves only as a challenge page, lacking any business or navigational elements. No CMS or backend technologies are detectable from the provided data. Performance and SEO cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The domain is protected with clientTransferProhibited status and uses Cloudflare name servers, indicating a modern and secure DNS setup. The technical debt or modernization needs cannot be evaluated without access to the actual website content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nami.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nami.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.