Skip to main content

Security report for nameshield.com

Nameshield · Technology · France

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

90/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nameshield is a French-based company specializing in the security and management of strategic domain names and associated services. Positioned as a leading registrar certified under ISO 27001, the company offers a comprehensive portfolio of cybersecurity solutions including DNS protection, SSL/TLS certificates, DMARC, and intellectual property protection services. Their market position is reinforced by memberships in recognized cybersecurity and domain industry groups such as Hexatrust, InterCERT France, ACN, Clusif, and ICANN. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and multilingual support, targeting businesses and organizations concerned with digital asset protection. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools including Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and HubSpot. The site is mobile optimized and implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is strong, with HTTPS enforced, security headers present, and adherence to ISO 27001 standards. However, the absence of publicly available WHOIS data for the domain introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration transparency. Overall, Nameshield demonstrates a robust security and compliance framework suitable for its business domain. The lack of explicit incident response contact details and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests areas for improvement. The company’s digital maturity and trust indicators position it well in the cybersecurity and domain management market, though verifying domain registration details would enhance trust further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nameshield.com

This scan found 9 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
95
Email security
98
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
90

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nameshield.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for nameshield.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nameshield operates in the technology sector, focusing on domain name registration and cybersecurity services. Their business model revolves around providing secure domain management and intellectual property protection to corporate clients. The company leverages certifications and industry memberships to differentiate itself and build trust. Their target customers are enterprises and organizations requiring advanced protection of their digital assets. The website content and testimonials indicate a medium-sized company with a strong reputation in France and internationally. The use of multiple languages and comprehensive resource offerings suggests a growth-oriented strategy. Partnerships with cybersecurity groups and participation in industry events further strengthen their market presence.

Security posture

The company maintains a high security maturity level, evidenced by ISO 27001 certification and multiple cybersecurity memberships. The website enforces HTTPS and includes security headers, indicating good baseline security hygiene. Cookie consent and privacy policies align with GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content or scripts. However, the absence of a published incident response contact or security.txt file limits transparency in vulnerability handling. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts is standard but should be regularly audited to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced incident response visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated incident response page or contact email to improve security transparency and facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  2. Implement and publish a security.txt file to formalize vulnerability disclosure policies.
  3. Enhance data retention and privacy policy transparency, including clear retention periods and user rights.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.
  5. Consider multi-factor authentication for client login portals to strengthen access security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nameshield
Description
Premier registrar certifié ISO 27001, Nameshield sécurise vos noms de domaine stratégiques et services associés. Découvrez nos solutions.
Key services
Domain name registration and management, Cybersecurity solutions including DNS protection, SSL/TLS certificates, DMARC, Intellectual property protection and remediation, Consulting and expert advice on domain and brand protection
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, jQuery
Frameworks
ISO 27001
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ISO 27001 certified operations
  • Cookie consent banner with configurable preferences
  • Use of secure forms and input validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong emphasis on cybersecurity and domain name protection services.
  3. Multiple certifications and memberships enhance trustworthiness.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or private, which is a concern but not uncommon for security-focused businesses.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. Contact information is available primarily via contact forms and social media; no explicit phone numbers or emails found in visible content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a modern theme and plugins such as Yoast SEO and Google Analytics integration. The technical stack includes jQuery and HubSpot marketing tools. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site uses HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and security headers. There is room for improvement in incident response mechanisms and vulnerability disclosure. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and secure online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nameshield.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nameshield.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.