Skip to main content

Security report for nalunaarutit.gl

Namminersorlutik Oqartussat · Government · Greenland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'nalunaarutit.gl' serves as the official Greenland government portal for legislative announcements and legal notifications. It provides access to government-issued legal documents and updates primarily targeted at Greenlandic citizens, legal professionals, and government officials. The site offers search functionality to locate specific legislative texts and maintains a consistent government branding with official logos and domain usage. Technically, the site is built using Vue.js and custom CSS, delivering a moderate performance experience with a load time of approximately 4.5 seconds. Mobile optimization is good, and the site supports Greenlandic and Danish languages. However, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate, serving content over HTTP only, which significantly impacts its security posture. No advanced security headers or privacy policies are present, and no analytics or advertising tools are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Contact information is clearly provided with an official government email and physical address. Overall, the site is credible as an official government resource but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nalunaarutit.gl

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
100
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as the authoritative source for Greenlandic legislative information, fulfilling a critical government transparency function. Its business model is non-commercial, focusing on public service and legal dissemination. The target audience includes Greenland residents, legal entities, and government stakeholders. The site’s competitive advantage lies in its official status and direct publication of government documents. The absence of commercial advertising or tracking tools aligns with its public service nature. The partnership ecosystem includes related Greenland government domains such as 'naalakkersuisut.gl' and Danish government sites. Growth indicators are not applicable given the government nature, but the site maintains consistent branding and content relevance. Strategic observations suggest the site could benefit from enhanced digital security and privacy compliance to meet modern standards.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is weak due to the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, exposing users to potential data interception risks. The lack of security headers such as HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, and X-Frame-Options further increases vulnerability to common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited transparency on security governance. The site does not implement cookie or privacy policies, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and related regulations. While no malware or phishing indicators are detected, the fundamental lack of encryption and security best practices represents a critical risk. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, limiting the site's ability to manage security incidents effectively.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  5. Establish and publicize an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Namminersorlutik Oqartussat
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend framework (Vue.js) and custom CSS for styling, indicating a contemporary technical approach. The site loads 25 resources totaling approximately 222 KB with a load time of about 4.5 seconds, which is moderate but could be optimized. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly detected. The site lacks HTTPS, which is a major technical deficiency. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA labels and language attributes present. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags and Open Graph tags included but no structured JSON-LD data found. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, which reduces privacy concerns but also limits user behavior insights. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nalunaarutit.gl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nalunaarutit.gl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.