Skip to main content

Security report for nakarte.me

See PrivacyGuardian.org · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

nakarte.me is a specialized online mapping service offering users access to various map layers, track management, and panorama viewing capabilities. It integrates multiple map sources such as OpenStreetMap, Google, and Yandex, catering primarily to outdoor enthusiasts and GIS users. The platform is small-scale, founded in 2018, and operates with a donation-based model without evident commercial advertising or tracking. Technically, the site uses JavaScript and Leaflet.js for map rendering and is hosted via CloudNS DNS services. The website is moderately optimized for mobile and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and visible SSL/TLS configuration details, which impacts its security posture. The domain registration is privacy-protected but consistent with a legitimate small tech service. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nakarte.me

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, focusing on geospatial mapping and track management services. Its niche positioning leverages open map data and multiple map providers to offer a versatile tool for users interested in geographic data visualization. The business model appears to be free access with donation support, targeting outdoor and GIS communities. There is no evidence of extensive partnerships or subsidiaries. The domain's privacy protection aligns with common practices for small tech services. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not explicit, suggesting a community-driven or hobbyist project rather than a commercial enterprise.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS likely enabled (inferred from URL scheme), but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published. The use of privacy-protected WHOIS is justified but limits transparency. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, publish policies, and improve SSL/TLS configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable and enforce HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify with security testing tools.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  3. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Add a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Consider adding contact phone numbers and physical address to improve business credibility and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
See PrivacyGuardian.org
Description
nakarte.me is an online map service providing various map layers, track management, and panorama viewing features. It integrates multiple map sources including OpenStreetMap, Google, Yandex, and others, targeting users interested in geographic data visualization and track editing.
Key services
Map visualization, Track loading and editing, Panorama viewing, Map printing and export
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Leaflet.js, OpenStreetMap tiles, CloudNS DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a functional online mapping tool with multiple map sources and track management features.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. Contact email is provided but no phone or physical address found.
  4. No security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  5. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  6. Domain uses privacy protection service for WHOIS data.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site content is fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with Leaflet.js for interactive maps and integrates multiple external map tile providers. The hosting is via CloudNS DNS with no DNSSEC enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity. The site loads multiple JavaScript bundles and CSS files asynchronously, indicating a modular frontend architecture. Performance is moderate with no explicit performance optimization indicators. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO optimization is minimal with no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. The site does not use a CMS or common frameworks beyond Leaflet.js. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC, missing security headers, and absence of privacy compliance artifacts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nakarte.me. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nakarte.me.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.