Skip to main content

Security report for nadyarubina.eu

Nadya Rubina Photography · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadya Rubina Photography is a small family photography business based in Riga, Latvia, offering a range of portrait and lifestyle photography services including maternity, newborn, couples, and personal branding sessions. The website serves as a portfolio and contact point for potential clients, featuring galleries, client testimonials, and social media links. The business targets families and individuals seeking professional photography in the local market. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Bootstrap and jQuery, and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and has a moderate performance profile. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms, but lacks security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nadyarubina.eu

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the photography sector, focusing on family and lifestyle photography in Riga. It leverages a portfolio-driven business model with direct client engagement via contact forms and social media. The presence of testimonials and detailed portfolio categories indicates a mature local market presence. The company appears to be a sole proprietorship or small enterprise without subsidiaries or parent companies. Revenue streams are likely from direct photography session bookings. The website's multilingual support (Russian, English, Latvian) suggests targeting a diverse local audience. No partnerships or payment processors beyond standard social media and analytics tools are evident.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which could mitigate common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanism is present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and enable HSTS.
  3. Add a security.txt file to provide a clear vulnerability disclosure channel.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate security risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security audits to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadya Rubina Photography
Description
Семейный фотограф в Риге (Family photographer in Riga)
Key services
Family photography, Maternity photography, Newborn lifestyle photography, Mother and baby photography, Portraiture, Couples photography, Personal branding photography, Catalog photography
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats (WordPress.com Stats)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a portfolio and service site for a family photographer in Riga, Latvia.
  2. Content is primarily in Russian with language alternates for English and Latvian.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including email and phone.
  5. Site uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Analytics.
  6. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. No signs of malware or phishing.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages found.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  10. Site content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a child theme using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for UI interactions. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking and performance monitoring. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam. Performance is moderate with standard optimization but could benefit from further improvements. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, but security headers are missing which is a technical risk. Hosting is likely with GoDaddy.com, LLC as the registrar, but hosting provider details are not explicit.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nadyarubina.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nadyarubina.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.