Skip to main content

Security report for nadaciaspp.sk

Nadácia SPP · Energy · Slovakia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and DNS health.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadácia SPP is a Slovak non-profit foundation with over 20 years of experience supporting community projects in health, culture, education, volunteering, regional development, and humanitarian aid. The foundation operates multiple grant programs and partners with organizations across Slovakia to improve social welfare and community development. The website reflects a mature digital presence with clear branding, comprehensive content, and a focus on transparency and compliance. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Oxygen Builder and integrates standard plugins for forms, cookie consent, and analytics. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers could be improved. The site demonstrates GDPR compliance and provides clear contact and legal information, enhancing trustworthiness.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of nadaciaspp.sk. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nadaciaspp.sk

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation holds a strong market position in Slovakia's non-profit sector, leveraging its affiliation with SPP (Slovenský plynárenský priemysel) to support diverse social initiatives. Its business model centers on grant-making and partnership projects targeting various social sectors including health, education, culture, sports, and humanitarian aid. The foundation's target audience includes NGOs, educational institutions, healthcare providers, and community groups. The website's content and structure indicate a well-established organization with consistent branding and active engagement through social media. No direct revenue streams are visible, consistent with a non-profit grant foundation. The foundation's longevity and domain age support its credibility and operational stability.

Security posture

The website maintains a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Cookie consent is managed via a reputable GDPR plugin, and forms are implemented securely using Contact Form 7. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not evident, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or suspicious scripts were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy documentation are absent, which could be enhanced to improve security maturity. Overall, the site aligns well with GDPR requirements and demonstrates good security hygiene for a non-profit organization.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance monitoring and logging to detect and respond to potential security incidents promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nadácia SPP
Registration number
203/Na-2002/689
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadácia SPP
Description
Podporujeme aktivity a projekty v oblasti ochrany zdravia, kultúry, vzdelania, dobrovoľníctva a regionálneho rozvoja.
Key services
Grant programs, Partnership projects, Support for health, culture, education, sports, humanitarian aid
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Oxygen Builder, jQuery, Contact Form 7, Complianz GDPR plugin, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with Contact Form 7

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Strong focus on community and social grant programs
  3. Compliant with GDPR and cookie regulations
  4. Uses modern WordPress plugins and frameworks
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  6. Clear contact and legal information provided
  7. Active social media presence linked
  8. No terms of service page found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Oxygen Builder, leveraging modern web technologies including jQuery and standard plugins for forms and GDPR compliance. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility features and SEO meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading images and asynchronous script loading. The technical stack is well maintained but could benefit from additional security headers and performance tuning. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly web presence suitable for the foundation's mission.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nadaciaspp.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nadaciaspp.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.