Skip to main content

Security report for nadaciaspp.sk

Nadácia SPP · Energy · Slovakia

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and DNS health.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadácia SPP is a Slovak non-profit foundation established in 2002, focused on supporting activities and projects in health protection, culture, education, volunteering, and regional development. It operates various grant programs and partnership projects aimed at improving community welfare across Slovakia. The foundation is affiliated with SPP, a major energy company, enhancing its credibility and market position. The website reflects a mature digital presence with clear branding, comprehensive content, and a user-friendly interface targeting non-profit organizations, communities, and institutions in Slovakia. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Oxygen Builder, with modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery and integration of Google Tag Manager for analytics. It employs GDPR-compliant cookie management and contact forms for newsletter subscriptions, indicating a good level of digital maturity and privacy awareness. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and cookie consent mechanisms. While some security headers are not explicitly detected, the overall posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact is noted. Overall, Nadácia SPP's website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, supporting its mission as a reputable non-profit foundation. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to further strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nadaciaspp.sk

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nadácia SPP holds a strong position in the Slovak non-profit sector, leveraging its affiliation with the energy sector (SPP) to fund and support community projects. Its business model centers on grant-making and partnership collaborations across multiple social sectors including health, education, culture, and sports. The foundation targets NGOs, educational institutions, healthcare providers, and community groups, indicating a broad and inclusive customer segment. The website's content and structure suggest a focus on transparency and community engagement, with active communication channels and social media presence. Growth indicators include ongoing grant programs and recent news updates. The partnership ecosystem is primarily local and sector-specific, with no detected subsidiaries or related commercial domains.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, GDPR-compliant cookie consent, and use of reputable WordPress security and privacy plugins. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options could be improved. There is no public security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency in security governance. The site does not publish a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure. Overall, the security culture appears adequate for a non-profit organization but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header configurations to mitigate risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to prevent vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic accessibility testing to ensure compliance with standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nadácia SPP
Registration number
203/Na-2002/689
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadácia SPP
Description
Podporujeme aktivity a projekty v oblasti ochrany zdravia, kultúry, vzdelania, dobrovoľníctva a regionálneho rozvoja.
Key services
Grant programs, Partnership projects, Support for health, culture, education, humanitarian aid, sports
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Oxygen Builder, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Complianz GDPR plugin, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and GDPR plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Clear focus on grant programs and community support in Slovakia.
  3. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie consent requirements.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  5. Good use of modern web technologies and accessibility features.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Oxygen Builder, leveraging jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. It uses Contact Form 7 for form management and Complianz GDPR plugin for cookie consent. The site loads CSS and JS resources efficiently with lazy loading for images, improving performance. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented, including an accessibility toggle. SEO metadata and Open Graph tags are comprehensive, supporting good search engine visibility and social media sharing. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through further optimization of scripts and caching. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for the foundation's needs, with room for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nadaciaspp.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nadaciaspp.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.