Skip to main content

Security report for n8serviss.lv

N8 SIA · Other · Latvia

Critical risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

24/100

Risk levelCritical

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

N8 SIA is a small Latvian company specializing in warranty and post-warranty repair services for electric tools, notably serving as an authorized FEIN tool service provider in the Baltic region. Their business model focuses on direct customer service, technical maintenance, and courier delivery options. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and multilingual support, primarily in Russian, targeting customers in Latvia and neighboring countries. Technically, the site uses modern frontend libraries such as Bootstrap and jQuery and integrates Google Maps for location display, but lacks CMS or advanced analytics tools. Security posture is moderate with cookie consent implemented but lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and trust. Privacy compliance is limited due to absence of a dedicated privacy policy page, although cookie usage is disclosed. Overall, the site presents a legitimate small business with room for improvement in security and compliance to enhance trust and protect customer data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching n8serviss.lv

This scan found 17 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
DNS health
75
GDPR outside view
0
Average
24

Not counted

  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a niche market position as an authorized FEIN warranty service center in the Baltics, leveraging direct factory partnerships to provide genuine parts and services. Their revenue streams likely come from repair services, maintenance contracts, and courier logistics. The target customers include both individual tool owners and businesses requiring reliable electric tool servicing. The website content and contact details support a transparent and customer-focused approach. However, the lack of broader digital marketing, social media presence, or advanced analytics suggests a localized and traditional business model. Growth opportunities may include expanding online presence, improving digital security, and formalizing compliance documentation to build greater customer confidence.

Security posture

The current security maturity is basic. The site lacks HTTPS enforcement, which is a critical vulnerability exposing users to data interception risks. No security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS are detected, increasing susceptibility to common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, limiting transparency and preparedness for security events. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating some awareness of privacy regulations, but absence of a privacy policy page and data protection officer contact reduces GDPR compliance confidence. The site uses standard libraries without detected vulnerabilities but would benefit from security hardening and formal policy publication to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, usage, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Develop and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance security transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
N8 SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
N8 SIA
Description
N8 SIA provides warranty and post-warranty repair services for electric tools, including FEIN brand tools, servicing Latvia and Baltic countries. They offer technical maintenance, repair, and courier delivery services.
Key services
Warranty and post-warranty repair of electric tools, Technical maintenance of electric tools, Courier pickup and delivery services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.0.0-beta, jQuery 3.2.1, Google Maps API, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. Content is primarily in Russian with some Latvian and English elements.
  3. No privacy policy page found, but cookie consent banner is present.
  4. Terms of service are available via modal dialogs on the main page.
  5. Contact information is clearly displayed including email, phone, and physical address.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. No security or incident response policies published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. No data protection officer contact information found.
  10. Website uses modern frontend libraries but no CMS detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Bootstrap 4 and jQuery 3.2.1, ensuring responsive design and good user experience on mobile devices. Google Maps API integration provides location services. However, no CMS or backend technology is evident, suggesting a static or custom-built site. Performance is moderate with external dependencies on CDNs. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal with no structured data or Open Graph metadata detected. The absence of HTTPS and security headers represents a technical risk. Overall, the infrastructure is adequate for a small business but requires modernization and security enhancements to support growth and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with n8serviss.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review n8serviss.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.