Skip to main content

Security report for myworld.com

myWorld · E-commerce · Finland

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

myWorld is an international e-commerce cashback and rewards platform that enables consumers to earn cashback and shopping points from purchases made through partner companies. The platform offers deals, benefits, discount codes, and premium membership options to enhance user savings. The website is localized for Finland, targeting Finnish-speaking consumers interested in cashback shopping. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap 5, and integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Microsoft Application Insights, Google Tag Manager, and Interaction Studio. The presence of a OneTrust cookie consent banner indicates attention to privacy compliance, although no explicit privacy policy or terms of service were detected in the provided content. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. WHOIS data for the domain is missing, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the website is professional, user-friendly, and trustworthy, but would benefit from improved transparency in privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching myworld.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
75
Email security
62
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention myworld.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
18,418
Employees
7
Customers
18,359
Third parties
52
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2026-05-16 · 66 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for myworld.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –webmail.myworld.com2026-05-16
  • –webmail.myworld.com2026-03-30
  • –myworld.com2025-09-20
  • –myworld.com2025-09-20
  • –webmail.myworld.com2025-07-31

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

myWorld operates in the e-commerce sector as a cashback and affiliate marketing platform. Its business model revolves around partnering with retailers and service providers to offer cashback incentives to consumers, thereby driving sales and customer loyalty. The platform targets price-conscious shoppers seeking deals and rewards. The company maintains a broad international presence with localized sites, including Finland. Key revenue streams likely include affiliate commissions and premium memberships. The website's integration with multiple social media channels and marketing tools suggests an active digital marketing strategy. The absence of detailed company registration and contact information online may be a strategic choice or an oversight, warranting further due diligence for business partnerships or compliance assessments.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS encryption and implementation of cookie consent mechanisms. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and others reduces the overall security robustness. No security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, which are important for transparency and trust. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a potential red flag, although it may be due to privacy protection or data source limitations. No signs of malware, phishing, or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site uses reputable analytics and marketing services, but the extent of user tracking should be monitored for privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing security policies and improving HTTP header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages linked prominently on the website.
  2. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add standard security HTTP headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Provide verified company contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
myWorld
Description
myWorld offers cashback and shopping points for purchases made through their partner companies, providing deals, benefits, and discount codes to shop at affordable prices.
Key services
Cashback rewards, Shopping points, Deals and discount codes, Premium membership, Travel search
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 5, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights, Interaction Studio (Evergage), Swiper.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Application Insights, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Application Insights, Interaction Studio (Evergage)
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent, Interaction Studio
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is localized for Finland with Finnish language and regional targeting.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service links found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via OneTrust with a visible banner and scripts.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Social media presence is strong with official Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, and Pinterest links.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  9. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces trust but website content is professional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap 5, and Swiper.js for UI components and responsiveness. It integrates with multiple third-party services such as OneTrust for cookie consent, Google Tag Manager for analytics, Microsoft Application Insights for telemetry, and Interaction Studio for marketing personalization. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and lazy loading of media assets. Performance appears moderate with CDN usage for static assets. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD data. No CMS was explicitly detected. Hosting appears to be managed via the myworld.com infrastructure and associated CDNs. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for improvement in accessibility and security header configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with myworld.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review myworld.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.