Skip to main content

Security report for mysportsession.com

My Sport Session · Other · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

My Sport Session is an online platform based in France that enables users to discover and book a wide variety of sports and leisure activities without subscription or commitment. The service emphasizes flexibility, local availability, and ease of booking, targeting a broad audience interested in physical activities and leisure. The website is professionally designed with a consistent brand presence and includes user testimonials and social media integration to build trust. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including React and Google Tag Manager, with asynchronous and deferred script loading to optimize performance. The site is mobile-optimized and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. There is a lack of visible security headers and no published privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain is a notable concern, potentially indicating recent registration or privacy protection, which impacts trustworthiness. Overall, the platform presents a good user experience and a solid technical foundation but should enhance transparency around privacy, security policies, and contact information to improve compliance and user trust. Further verification of domain registration is recommended to confirm legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mysportsession.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

My Sport Session operates in the niche market of flexible sports and leisure activity bookings in France. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a large selection of activities without subscription or engagement, appealing to users seeking convenience and variety. The business model is based on direct online bookings with payment options on site or online, targeting individual consumers and possibly small groups. The platform's growth is supported by active social media channels and positive user testimonials. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies, suggesting an independent medium-sized enterprise. Strategic partnerships or payment processors are not explicitly identified in the data provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google Tag Manager for analytics. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are visible, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. There is no evidence of a published incident response policy or security contact channels. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are apparent, improvements in security headers, privacy transparency, and incident response readiness are recommended to enhance security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen web security.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including security incident response contacts and consider publishing a security.txt file.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy and user trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and comply with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
My Sport Session
Description
Découvrez et réservez autour de vous, votre sport ou loisir préféré, à la carte et sans abonnement, 24h/24 sans frais.
Key services
Activity search and booking, Wide range of sports and leisure activities, Booking without subscription or commitment, Payment on site or online, Cancellation options
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (implied by data-react-helmet attributes), Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with async and defer scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage content provided.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  4. Social media links to Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn are present and appear legitimate.
  5. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript frameworks.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces trustworthiness.
  7. Website content is in French and targets French-speaking users interested in sports and leisure activities.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No visible certifications or security frameworks mentioned.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript framework (React) with server-side rendering hints (data-react-helmet) for SEO optimization. External resources include Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager, indicating integration with common web services. The site loads scripts asynchronously and defers non-critical scripts to improve performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the data. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing resource loading and accessibility. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mysportsession.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mysportsession.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.