Skip to main content

Security report for myonlygirls.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MyOnlyGirls.com is a niche content aggregation platform focused on indexing and enabling search for OnlyFans creators and related adult content influencers. The website offers categorized listings and search functionality to help users discover creators by tags such as trends, Instagram celebrities, pornstars, Twitch streamers, and regional categories. The business model centers on content discovery and referral traffic to creators' profiles. The site is relatively new, with domain registration in October 2023, and targets users interested in adult content and social media influencers. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Vue.js, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, and uses Yandex Metrika for analytics. The site is mobile optimized and has a good user experience with clear navigation and consistent branding. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks explicit security headers and privacy policies. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site is fully accessible. Contact information is provided via email and Telegram, but no privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the site is functional and professionally presented but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching myonlygirls.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform operates in the adult content aggregation niche, focusing on OnlyFans creators and related social media influencers. It leverages categorized tags and search to attract users seeking specific content types or creators. The business likely generates revenue through affiliate or referral links, though no explicit monetization details are present. The target audience includes adult content consumers and fans of social media celebrities. The site is small in scale and newly founded in 2023, with no parent company or subsidiaries identified. Partnership opportunities are mentioned with contact details provided, indicating openness to collaboration. The competitive advantage lies in curated and categorized content discovery for a popular adult subscription platform. Growth potential depends on expanding creator listings and improving compliance and trust signals.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable registrar and DNS providers, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The site collects user input via a search form but does not indicate secure handling or validation explicitly. Analytics tracking via Yandex Metrika is present, but privacy compliance is weak due to missing cookie and privacy policies. The domain is not DNSSEC enabled, which could be improved. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in headers, policies, and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  4. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to increase transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update analytics and tracking practices to align with privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Search for OnlyFans accounts based on your interests and discover top creators. Explore fitness, adult content, cooking, and more!
Key services
Search OnlyFans profiles by keywords, Categorized listings of creators by tags and trends, Links to creators' OnlyFans and social media profiles
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Nuxt.js, Vue.js, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a content aggregator for OnlyFans creators with categorized tags and search functionality
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  3. Contact information is provided via email and Telegram in footer
  4. Site uses modern Nuxt.js framework and is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS
  5. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content
  6. Uses Yandex Metrika for analytics tracking
  7. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms
  8. WHOIS data shows recent domain registration with no privacy protection
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript framework (Nuxt.js) built on Vue.js, indicating a contemporary and maintainable tech stack. Hosting is behind Cloudflare DNS, providing DNS reliability and some protection. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets asynchronously and uses module preload for performance optimization. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly with good SEO meta tags including Open Graph. However, no CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed metrics but good structural practices. Accessibility is basic with standard HTML5 semantics but no ARIA roles or advanced accessibility features detected. Technical debt appears low but security header omissions and lack of privacy policies represent areas for modernization and compliance enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with myonlygirls.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review myonlygirls.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.