Skip to main content

Security report for mylittlebigweb.com

My Little Big Web · Technology · Canada

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

My Little Big Web is a well-established digital marketing agency based in Montreal, Canada, founded in 2013. The company specializes in SEO, PPC advertising, social media management, and web design services tailored primarily for small and medium-sized enterprises in Quebec and Canada. The agency positions itself as a reliable, transparent, and results-oriented partner with a strong local presence and a human-centric approach. Their website reflects a professional and comprehensive service offering, supported by multiple certifications and positive client testimonials. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern tools and analytics integrations, optimized for performance and SEO. Security posture is good with HTTPS and domain protections, though some security headers and policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear cookie consent and a comprehensive privacy policy. Overall, the website and business demonstrate high professionalism and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mylittlebigweb.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
70
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency operates in the technology and marketing sector, focusing on digital marketing services for SMEs. Their business model is service-based, offering a full suite of marketing solutions under one roof without subcontracting, emphasizing quality and client proximity. The company leverages partnerships with major platforms like Google, Meta, and LinkedIn, enhancing credibility and market reach. Their growth is supported by a multidisciplinary team and a strong local footprint. The absence of a sales team and reliance on inbound marketing reflects a modern, trust-based client acquisition strategy. The agency's market position is strong within Montreal's competitive digital marketing landscape, supported by positive reviews and certifications.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized domain transfers. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts are integrated, including HubSpot, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar, which increases tracking but is managed with cookie consent mechanisms. The site uses reCAPTCHA Enterprise for form protection, enhancing security against bots. However, some recommended security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly detected, representing an area for improvement. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact is a minor gap in transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to enhance security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities from external dependencies.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to stay compliant with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
My Little Big Web
Description
Agence Web à Montréal qui offre des résultats concrets en SEO, conception de site Web, Google Ads, Facebook Ads, réseaux sociaux.
Key services
Référencement naturel – SEO, Publicité en ligne – SEA et SMM, Gestion des médias sociaux – SMO, Conception de sites Web
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Slick Carousel, HubSpot forms and analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, NitroPack
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA Enterprise
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Pinterest Ads, TikTok Ads, Instagram Ads, Amazon Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Yoast SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Strong local presence emphasized with Montreal and Quebec focus.
  3. Multiple certifications and trust signals present.
  4. Comprehensive service offerings in digital marketing and web design.
  5. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools.
  6. Good privacy and cookie compliance with consent mechanisms.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response contact.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a child theme, utilizing popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization and Complianz GDPR for cookie management. The tech stack includes jQuery, Slick Carousel for sliders, HubSpot forms and analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, and NitroPack for performance optimization. Hosting is managed via WHC Online Solutions Inc. with DNS services through Cloudflare. The site demonstrates fast loading times, excellent mobile responsiveness, and good accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD schema. The technical infrastructure is modern and robust, supporting a professional digital marketing agency's needs.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mylittlebigweb.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mylittlebigweb.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.