Skip to main content

Security report for mygp.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website mygp.cz presents a login portal for the mygp-cz realm, utilizing the Keycloak authentication framework. The site is primarily designed for user authentication with a clean, minimal interface focused on login functionality. The technical infrastructure leverages modern CSS frameworks such as PatternFly and Zocial, and is hosted on Amazon AWS DNS infrastructure, indicating a reliable hosting environment. However, the site lacks public-facing content such as privacy policies, cookie notices, or terms of service, which limits transparency and compliance visibility. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and secure form practices, but lacks explicit security headers and advanced protections. Overall, the site serves its authentication purpose but requires enhancements in privacy compliance, security headers, and user-facing information to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mygp.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention mygp.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
20
Employees
0
Customers
20
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
10%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for mygp.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to be a small to medium-sized entity operating since 2019, focused on providing a secure login service likely tied to a marketplace or platform (indicated by client_id=marketplace-ui). The absence of public business information and contact details suggests a service-oriented model targeting registered users rather than public consumers. The use of Keycloak and AWS infrastructure points to a modern, scalable approach. Market positioning is unclear due to limited public content, but the service likely supports a niche or internal user base. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed in the content provided.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and secure form submission with autocomplete disabled on sensitive fields, which are positive indicators. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is present, limiting transparency for security issues. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps, especially under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved with standard security headers and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies accessible from the login page.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  4. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility features to enhance user experience.
  5. Enhance SEO with meta tags and structured data to improve discoverability and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
PatternFly CSS 4.8.3, Zocial CSS
Frameworks
Keycloak (authentication server)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL scheme)
  • Secure login form with POST method
  • Autocomplete off on sensitive fields

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for mygp-cz, likely a service platform requiring authentication.
  2. No public-facing content such as privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found on the login page.
  3. No contact information or business details visible on the login page.
  4. Use of Keycloak authentication framework indicates a modern identity management approach.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  6. No social media or external marketing links present.
  7. Minimal SEO and accessibility features present.
  8. No security headers or advanced security policies detected in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern CSS framework (PatternFly) and the Keycloak authentication platform, indicating a contemporary technical stack focused on identity management. Hosting on AWS DNS servers suggests reliable infrastructure. The HTML is valid and includes meta viewport tags for responsiveness, though mobile optimization is basic. No CMS or analytics tools are detected, indicating a focused, minimalistic implementation. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content and external CSS usage. The absence of advanced SEO and accessibility features suggests room for technical improvement to meet modern web standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mygp.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mygp.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.