Skip to main content

Security report for myfeedback.fyi

Domains By Proxy, LLC · Other · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain myfeedback.fyi is currently a parked domain hosted on GoDaddy's parking platform, with no active business content or services offered. The site primarily serves as a placeholder with minimal content, including a Trustpilot widget referencing GoDaddy and a link to GoDaddy's privacy policy. There is no evidence of a functioning business, contact information, or user interaction features. The technical infrastructure is basic, relying on standard JavaScript and GoDaddy's parking system, with no CMS or advanced frameworks detected. Security posture is minimal, with no security headers or incident response information present, and DNSSEC is not enabled. Overall, the site lacks business credibility and privacy compliance beyond a basic privacy policy link. The domain registration is privacy-protected via Domains By Proxy, which is typical for parked domains and does not raise immediate suspicion but reduces trustworthiness. The website is safe with no adult or explicit content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching myfeedback.fyi

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain is not actively used for business and is parked by GoDaddy. There is no identifiable company operating the site, no contact details, and no business policies. The domain age is moderate (created in 2016), but the lack of content or services indicates no current market presence or revenue generation. The site targets a general audience but does not engage users. The business model is domain parking and potential resale. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident beyond GoDaddy's involvement as registrar and hosting provider.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the absence of security headers, lack of DNSSEC, and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The domain uses privacy protection for WHOIS, which is justified given the parked status. No forms or data collection reduce attack surface, but the lack of HTTPS confirmation and security best practices lowers the security score. There is no evidence of compliance with GDPR beyond a basic privacy policy link. Overall, the site presents low risk but also low security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and trust.
  2. Implement and verify HTTPS with strong TLS configuration.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact and business policy information if the domain is to be used actively.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Domains By Proxy, LLC
Description
Domain parking page courtesy of GoDaddy.com. No active business content.
Key services
domain parking, domain resale
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (implied by id=root and script structure), Trustpilot widget
Frameworks
PW (Parking Web system)
Platforms
GoDaddy parking platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
TrustArc (consent.truste.com)
Marketing tools
Trustpilot widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain page with no active business content.
  2. No contact information or business policies provided.
  3. Uses GoDaddy parking platform and privacy proxy for WHOIS.
  4. Includes Trustpilot widget referencing GoDaddy.
  5. No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  6. No forms or data collection present.
  7. No social media or company contact emails found.
  8. No GDPR compliance beyond basic privacy policy link.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response info.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses a minimal technical stack typical of domain parking pages, including JavaScript and a React-like root div. It loads external scripts from Google Adsense, Trustpilot, and TrustArc for consent management. The hosting is provided by GoDaddy, with domain registration via GoDaddy and privacy protection by Domains By Proxy. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility are poor due to lack of meaningful content and metadata. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected. The site is functional but minimalistic, with opportunities for modernization if repurposed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with myfeedback.fyi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review myfeedback.fyi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.