Skip to main content

Security report for mws-monitor.de

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website mws-monitor.de hosts a Matomo analytics platform login page, providing a free/libre analytics service interface. The platform targets users who manage or access web analytics data, offering key services such as visitor tracking and data reporting. The site is technically based on the Matomo framework, utilizing JavaScript and PHP technologies with AngularJS elements. The infrastructure appears standard for a self-hosted analytics platform, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security features include HTTPS enforcement and password confirmation, with support for two-factor authentication, though explicit security headers are not detected. Privacy compliance is minimal on this page, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, and no contact or business information is publicly available. The domain WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with hosting provider name servers, showing no immediate red flags. Overall, the site is functional for its purpose but lacks public-facing compliance and business transparency information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mws-monitor.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform operates within the technology sector, specifically in web analytics software. It serves a niche audience of website administrators and analysts seeking open-source analytics solutions. The business model likely revolves around providing analytics software, possibly with premium plugins or services, as indicated by Matomo branding. There is no explicit information on company size, founding year, or parent company. The lack of public contact details and policies suggests a focus on internal or registered users rather than public commercial engagement. The site’s ecosystem includes integration with Matomo’s marketplace and plugin system, indicating potential for expansion and customization. Market positioning appears as a specialized analytics tool rather than a broad commercial enterprise.

Security posture

Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and password protection mechanisms in place. The presence of two-factor authentication support is a positive indicator. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML, and forms include nonce tokens for CSRF protection. Overall, while basic security practices are followed, enhancements in headers and public security policies would improve the posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies accessible to users to improve compliance and transparency.
  2. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  3. Publish vulnerability disclosure and incident response procedures to build trust and readiness.
  4. Provide clear contact information and business details to enhance credibility and user confidence.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility features to enhance user experience across devices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
free/libre analytics platform
Key services
web analytics, visitor tracking, data reporting
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Matomo analytics platform, JavaScript, PHP
Frameworks
AngularJS (ng-app attribute), Matomo core framework
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Password confirmation required
  • Two-factor authentication supported (mentioned in scripts)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo tracking
Marketing tools
Matomo analytics platform
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login page for Matomo analytics platform instance
  2. No public privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on this page
  3. No contact information or business details publicly displayed
  4. Site uses HTTPS and standard Matomo security features
  5. No external advertising or affiliate links detected
  6. Content is minimal and focused on user authentication
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  8. WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with hosting provider
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Matomo analytics platform, leveraging PHP and JavaScript with AngularJS framework elements. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communication. Performance is moderate with deferred JavaScript loading and standard meta tags, but SEO optimization is minimal due to lack of descriptive metadata beyond basic description. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and comprehensive mobile responsiveness. There is no CMS detected beyond the Matomo platform itself. Hosting provider details are not explicit but inferred from DNS name servers. The technical setup is adequate for an analytics login portal but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mws-monitor.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mws-monitor.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.