Skip to main content

Security report for muzfest.org

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Muz Fest is a newly established music and cultural festival that aims to unite diverse artists, local vendors, and grassroots organizations in a vibrant community celebration. The website presents a professional and visually appealing design built on the Framer platform, hosted via Wix DNS services. The event targets a general audience primarily from the Pacific Northwest region and beyond, positioning itself as a regional cultural hub attracting thousands of attendees. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies and integrates Google Analytics and Google Ads for marketing and user tracking. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain registrar protections in place, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no advanced security headers are detected. Privacy compliance is lacking as no privacy or cookie policies are published, and no contact information or incident response details are provided, which may impact user trust and regulatory adherence. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy disclosures and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching muzfest.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Muz Fest operates as an event organization focused on music and cultural community engagement. Its business model revolves around hosting a festival that brings together artists, vendors, and sponsors, generating revenue likely through ticket sales, sponsorships, and vendor participation. The market positioning is regional with ambitions to attract a broad audience from the Pacific Northwest. The website's use of Framer and Wix indicates a lean digital infrastructure suited for rapid deployment and ease of content management. The absence of detailed business information, certifications, or contact data suggests a small-scale operation or early-stage launch. Marketing efforts leverage Google advertising and analytics, indicating an intent to grow audience reach. Strategic partnerships or related domains are not evident from the current data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain registrar status flags that prevent unauthorized transfers or updates. However, the lack of DNSSEC implementation exposes the domain to potential DNS spoofing risks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are observed, which could mitigate common web attacks. The absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited security governance and preparedness. Tracking scripts from Google Analytics and Ads are present, but no explicit user consent mechanisms or cookie banners are detected, raising privacy compliance concerns. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small event site but requiring improvements to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add visible and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers for user support and incident reporting.
  4. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Muz Fest unites music, culture, and community in a high-energy celebration. Featuring diverse artists, local vendors, and grassroots organizations, it’s a hub for creativity and connection. Drawing thousands from the Pacific Northwest and beyond.
Key services
music festival, community event, vendor and sponsor engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer, Google Analytics, Wix DNS
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Ads (AW-17260894448)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a newly launched event site for Muz Fest, a music and cultural festival.
  2. Content is professionally designed using Framer with good visual assets.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  5. Uses Google Analytics and Google Ads for tracking and marketing.
  6. Domain is secured with HTTPS and registrar protections but lacks DNSSEC.
  7. No security or incident response policies published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. No business certifications or DPO information available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Framer platform, leveraging modern web fonts and responsive design techniques. Hosting is managed through Wix DNS servers, indicating a managed hosting environment. Google Analytics and Google Ads scripts are integrated for tracking and marketing purposes. The site loads asynchronously Google Tag Manager and Google Ads scripts, which may impact performance but are standard for marketing. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). Mobile optimization appears good with viewport meta tags and responsive images. Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS other than Framer is detected. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in script loading and caching. No broken links or errors were detected in the accessible content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small event website but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with muzfest.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review muzfest.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.