Skip to main content

Security report for muzeumtgm.cz

Muzeum T.G.M. Rakovník · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Muzeum T.G.M. Rakovník is a regional museum organization operating multiple branches and cultural programs in the Central Bohemian Region of the Czech Republic. The institution focuses on preserving and presenting historical and cultural heritage through exhibitions, educational programs, and events targeted at the general public, schools, and tourists. The website reflects a government-affiliated public cultural entity with a clear mission and regional presence. Technically, the website employs a traditional tech stack including jQuery 1.7.2, Google Fonts, FontAwesome, Google Maps API, and a proprietary CMS (nnx CMS). It features a cookie consent mechanism and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a good design and navigation structure, though some technologies like jQuery are outdated, which may pose security risks. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and published security policies. The cookie consent banner indicates some privacy awareness, but no dedicated privacy policy or terms of service pages were found. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces trust in domain legitimacy, although the website content and government affiliation suggest a legitimate operation. No adult or questionable content is present, and no WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and trustworthy for its intended audience but would benefit from improved security practices, updated technologies, and clearer privacy documentation to enhance compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching muzeumtgm.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The museum operates as a public cultural institution under the Central Bohemian Region government, managing several museum branches and cultural venues. Its business model is non-commercial, focusing on cultural preservation and education. The target audience includes local residents, tourists, and educational institutions. The museum leverages partnerships with regional government and cultural organizations. The website supports event promotion and visitor engagement but lacks commercial features such as e-commerce. Growth indicators are limited but the institution maintains a stable regional presence with multiple sites and active cultural programming.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate but with notable gaps. The website uses HTTPS (assumed but not confirmed), includes a cookie consent mechanism, and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS. The use of an outdated jQuery version introduces potential vulnerabilities. No published security or incident response policies were found, and no dedicated contact channels for security issues exist. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via cookie consent but lacks comprehensive privacy documentation. Overall, the site is functional but requires improvements to meet modern security and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to current versions to reduce vulnerability exposure.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and GDPR compliance.
  4. Establish and publish incident response and security contact information to enhance security readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Muzeum T.G.M. Rakovník
Description
A regional museum organization in the Central Bohemian Region of the Czech Republic, managing multiple museum branches and cultural programs focused on history, exhibitions, and cultural events.
Key services
Museum exhibitions, Cultural programs and events, Educational programs for schools, Museum branches management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.7.2, Google Fonts (Open Sans, Crete Round), FontAwesome, Google Maps API, Mailocator cookie consent, Lightbox JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mailocator
Marketing tools
Mailocator cookie consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional museum site with multiple branches and cultural programs.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and may indicate privacy protection or registration issues.
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Contact phone and physical address clearly displayed.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Google Cultural Institute.
  7. Uses older jQuery version which may pose security risks.
  8. No visible security headers or advanced security policies.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS (nnx CMS) and uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.7.2, which is outdated and may pose security risks. It integrates Google Fonts and FontAwesome for styling and icons, and Google Maps API for location services. The site includes a cookie consent mechanism powered by Mailocator and uses Google Analytics for traffic analysis. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. The site could benefit from modernization of its tech stack and improved performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with muzeumtgm.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review muzeumtgm.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.