Skip to main content

Security report for muzeumlitovel.cz

Muzeum Litovel · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Muzeum Litovel is a small cultural institution based in the Czech Republic, dedicated to preserving and presenting local history and culture through exhibitions, educational programs, and community events. The website serves as an official portal providing detailed information about the museum's history, exhibitions, visitor information, and upcoming events. It targets a broad audience including local residents, tourists, schools, and researchers. Technically, the website is built on the Public4u CMS platform, utilizing Bootstrap and jQuery libraries, though some components like jQuery are outdated, indicating potential security risks. The site is accessible, well-structured, and includes social media integration, but lacks modern privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but missing security headers and outdated libraries. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from updates to security practices and privacy compliance to enhance user confidence and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching muzeumlitovel.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
40
Email security
95
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The museum operates as a non-profit cultural entity focused on heritage preservation and education. Its market position is local/regional with partnerships evident through linked municipal and cultural websites. The business model revolves around public engagement via exhibitions, events, and educational outreach. Revenue streams likely include visitor fees, grants, and donations, though not explicitly stated. The website content and structure reflect a stable operation with consistent branding and clear communication channels. Growth indicators include active event calendars and planned programs. The partnership ecosystem includes local government and cultural institutions, enhancing community integration and resource sharing.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. The website uses HTTPS, which is essential, but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.10.2) poses potential vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating gaps in compliance with GDPR and related regulations. There is no evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Data protection officer contact or security policies are not found, suggesting limited formal security governance. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires improvements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure process to enhance transparency and security readiness.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility features to enhance user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Muzeum Litovel
Description
Official website of the Litovel Museum providing information about the museum, exhibitions, events, visitor information, and museum society activities.
Key services
Museum exhibitions, Educational programs for schools, Cultural events and exhibitions, Visitor services including museum shop
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Bootstrap CSS and JS, Google Fonts (Open Sans)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, limiting domain registration insights.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Website uses older jQuery version which may pose security risks.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and YouTube is active and linked.
  8. Content is relevant, well-structured, and targeted to museum visitors and local community.
  9. No signs of adult or unsafe content detected.
  10. Technical implementation is moderate with room for modernization and security improvements.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Public4u CMS platform with Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for scripting. It loads external resources such as Google Fonts and jQuery from trusted CDNs. The site structure is clear with well-organized navigation menus and event calendars. Performance is moderate, with some legacy scripts that could impact speed and security. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking tools, indicating minimal data collection. The site lacks modern security headers and privacy mechanisms, which are technical debts that should be addressed. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the museum's needs but requires modernization to improve security, compliance, and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with muzeumlitovel.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review muzeumlitovel.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.