Skip to main content

Security report for muzeum-zlin.cz

Muzeum jihovýchodní Moravy ve Zlíně · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Muzeum jihovýchodní Moravy ve Zlíně is a regional public museum serving the southeastern Moravia region in the Czech Republic. The institution offers a variety of cultural and educational services including exhibitions, events, workshops, and research activities. The website reflects a well-structured digital presence with clear navigation, detailed content about museum objects, exhibitions, and events, targeting general public visitors, schools, and researchers. The museum maintains active social media channels and provides a newsletter subscription to engage its audience. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Google WebFont Loader and Swiper.js for UI components, and includes GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured navigation. However, no explicit CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the source. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes secure forms with anti-spam measures. While no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML source, no vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern and reduces the overall trust score, though the website content and partner links support legitimacy. Overall, the museum's website is professional, informative, and user-friendly, with room for improvement in transparency of domain registration and enhanced security header implementation.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of muzeum-zlin.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching muzeum-zlin.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The museum operates as a government or non-profit entity focused on cultural preservation and education. Its market position is regional, serving the Zlín area and southeastern Moravia. The business model revolves around public engagement through exhibitions, events, and educational programs, supplemented by research and publication activities. Revenue streams likely include public funding, event fees, and sales of publications or souvenirs. The museum has established partnerships with regional organizations and sponsors, enhancing its ecosystem. Growth indicators include active event programming and digital engagement via social media and newsletters. Strategic observations suggest a stable institution with a focus on community outreach and cultural heritage preservation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with mandatory HTTPS and secure form handling. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options indicates potential areas for enhancement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, which could limit transparency and responsiveness to security issues. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable gap in trust and legitimacy verification. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a public-facing cultural institution but could benefit from formalized policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program, potentially including a security.txt file, to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Muzeum jihovýchodní Moravy ve Zlíně
Description
Stránky věnované objektům ve správě muzea, expozicím, výstavám a doprovodným programům a další činnosti muzea.
Key services
Museum exhibitions, Cultural events and programs, Educational workshops, Research and publication services, Museum object management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google WebFont Loader, Swiper.js, jQuery (implied by ajax.googleapis.com usage), Custom JavaScript bundle, GDPR API scripts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form with hidden anti-spam fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (implied by gtag usage)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with explicit consent mechanisms.
  4. No visible security headers detected in HTML source; server headers not provided.
  5. No exposed emails or phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contacts found in HTML.
  6. Social media presence is well integrated with official Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube links.
  7. Multiple museum objects and events are detailed with clear descriptions and dates.
  8. Newsletter subscription form includes anti-spam hidden field and secure tokens.
  9. No terms of service page explicitly found.
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Google WebFont Loader for typography and Swiper.js for interactive sliders. The presence of GDPR API scripts indicates compliance with privacy regulations. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO meta tags and structured navigation menus. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and resource management. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. The technical infrastructure supports the museum's digital engagement goals but could be enhanced with improved security headers and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with muzeum-zlin.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review muzeum-zlin.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.